2019
DOI: 10.5194/bg-2019-311
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensions of Marine Phytoplankton Diversity

Abstract: <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Biodiversity of phytoplankton is important for ecosystem stability and marine biogeochemistry. However, the large scale patterns of diversity are not well understood, and are often poorly characterized in terms of statistical relationships with environmental factors (e.g. latitude, temperature, productivity). Here we use ecological theory and a global trait-based ecosystem model to provide mechanistic understanding of patterns of phytoplan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
86
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
5
86
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also examine how cell size impacts our results and differentiate “small” (≥3 μm) and “large” (>3 μm) phytoplankton (Figures c, d, and S1). We separate phytoplankton by size in this manner because the allometric scaling for specific growth rates has a unimodal shape: it peaks for cells approximately 3 μm in equivalent spherical diameter but decreases for smaller and larger cells (Dutkiewicz et al, ; Marañón et al, ). Much like for gleaners and opportunists, small phytoplankton dominate in oligotrophic regions while larger phytoplankton dominate in more seasonal and eutrophic regions (Figures c and d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also examine how cell size impacts our results and differentiate “small” (≥3 μm) and “large” (>3 μm) phytoplankton (Figures c, d, and S1). We separate phytoplankton by size in this manner because the allometric scaling for specific growth rates has a unimodal shape: it peaks for cells approximately 3 μm in equivalent spherical diameter but decreases for smaller and larger cells (Dutkiewicz et al, ; Marañón et al, ). Much like for gleaners and opportunists, small phytoplankton dominate in oligotrophic regions while larger phytoplankton dominate in more seasonal and eutrophic regions (Figures c and d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytoplankton cell sizes increase logarithmically from 0.6 to 228 μm in equivalent spherical diameter, with each functional group having a characteristic range of sizes (Figure S1). Cell size determines differences in maximum growth rates, grazing, and sinking, as described in Dutkiewicz et al (). Following observations, the smallest phytoplankton (the prokaryotes and picoeukaryotes) have the lowest nutrient affinity, and the fastest growing are in the 3 μm cell size range (Marañón et al, ).…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due the greater impact of currents and stratification in the Skagerrak-Kattegat compared to the Baltic Sea 23 which may enhance species richness of plankton due to, for example, advection from the North Sea. Including water transport in ecological models was recently demonstrated important in order to attain a high diversity of phytoplankton 24 . Mean α (alpha) species richness and α ENS, which represent the diversity of an interacting ecological assemblage, also increased with salinity but the increases were more modest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study provides insights into spatial and temporal variation in phytoplankton community structure and abundance along a broad salinity gradient. By simultaneously examining grazing, nutrients, and water transport, a recent ecosystem model demonstrated that phytoplankton diversity is sensitive to all these factors 24 . Here, we combined multiple environmental factors such as nutrients, temperature, and salinity, but could not identify the drivers of the seasonal variation in phytoplankton diversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most existing models parameterize the complex bacterial remineralization processes of the (sinking) organic matter with depth as a function of POC concentration and temperature, or by fitting with power law functions. Cellular functions, taxa, and functional gene expression of other prokaryotes, such as cyanobacteria (Hellweger 2010;Martín-Figueroa, Navarro, and Florencio 2000;Miller et al 2013), or a diverse suite of microbial functional groups (Coles et al 2017;Dutkiewicz et al 2020) have been modelled so far; however, our study is the first to explicitly model bacterial groups of different physiological traits.…”
Section: Model Performance and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%