1961
DOI: 10.1037/h0049163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensions of job perceptions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1963
1963
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the notable are: a dichotomous choice questionnaire and divergent occupational groups (Guilford, 1967); a descriptive list of personality traits (Blocher & Shuu, 1961;Kibrick, 1958); the Adjective Check List (ACL) (Gough & Heilbrun, 1965) in testing the assumption that occupational preferences are related to self-descriptions (Hollander & Parker, 1969, or exploring differences in the self-concept and occupational role expectations (Davis, 1969); M. Haire's Pick-A-Job Test used by Grunes (1957) exploring job perception through adjective-like descriptions; a role perception inventory derived from the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (U.S. Department of Labor, 1965) to allow respondents to select tasks as they related to perception of the occupation (Olive, 1964). Other studies of job perception have employed factor analysis techniques (Gonyea, 1961), need scales from the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (Dipboye & Anderson, 1961), stereotype questionnaires (Roe, 1974), and rating scales (Ulrich, Hechlik, & Roeber, 1966).…”
Section: Joan S Reischmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the notable are: a dichotomous choice questionnaire and divergent occupational groups (Guilford, 1967); a descriptive list of personality traits (Blocher & Shuu, 1961;Kibrick, 1958); the Adjective Check List (ACL) (Gough & Heilbrun, 1965) in testing the assumption that occupational preferences are related to self-descriptions (Hollander & Parker, 1969, or exploring differences in the self-concept and occupational role expectations (Davis, 1969); M. Haire's Pick-A-Job Test used by Grunes (1957) exploring job perception through adjective-like descriptions; a role perception inventory derived from the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (U.S. Department of Labor, 1965) to allow respondents to select tasks as they related to perception of the occupation (Olive, 1964). Other studies of job perception have employed factor analysis techniques (Gonyea, 1961), need scales from the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (Dipboye & Anderson, 1961), stereotype questionnaires (Roe, 1974), and rating scales (Ulrich, Hechlik, & Roeber, 1966).…”
Section: Joan S Reischmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The judgements are then analysed so as to interpret the underlying dimensions. This has been done by Vernon (1949), Grunes (1957), Gonyea (1961Gonyea ( , 1963, Coxon (1971), Burton (1972), andSiess &Rogers (1974), mostly using similarity rating. The analyses were subjective (Grunes), factor analytic (Vernon and Gonyea), multidimensional scaling (Burton, Siess BE Rogers) and content analysis (Coxon).…”
Section: Previous Work O N Perceived Occupational Similaritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job perceptions and occupational stereotypes play leading roles in most current theories of vocational choice. Some writers (Gonyea, 1961;Merwin & DiVesta, 1959) have suggested that occupational roles may be viewed largely in terms of perceived need satisfaction potential. Several recent studies (Gonyea, 1961;Grunes, 1957;O'Dowd & Beardslee, 1960;Walker, 1958) have sought to discover the dimensions by which occupations are commonly perceived.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some writers (Gonyea, 1961;Merwin & DiVesta, 1959) have suggested that occupational roles may be viewed largely in terms of perceived need satisfaction potential. Several recent studies (Gonyea, 1961;Grunes, 1957;O'Dowd & Beardslee, 1960;Walker, 1958) have sought to discover the dimensions by which occupations are commonly perceived. These investigations have differed from earlier studies of job perceptions (such as the long series of rankings of occupational prestige begun by Counts, 1925) in that the subject has been relatively free to choose his own dimensions, or at least to respond to several dimensions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%