Learning to Cooperate, Cooperating to Learn 1985
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-3650-9_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensions of Cooperative Classroom Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
21

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
39
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…The provision of information on the level of understanding of each student in the learning process can be considered as significant feedback, with the aim of defining the achievement level of each group member (Johnson & Johnson, 1999). It is necessary for other members in the group to provide assistance if one or some group members cannot finish the assigned tasks (Kagan, 1985). In an examination of cooperative learning on student's learning, Hooper, Ward, Hannafin & Clark (1989) found that cooperation resulted in higher achievement when individual accountability was structured rather than when it was not and argued that a lack of individual accountability may reduce feelings of personal responsibility.…”
Section: Individual Accountabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The provision of information on the level of understanding of each student in the learning process can be considered as significant feedback, with the aim of defining the achievement level of each group member (Johnson & Johnson, 1999). It is necessary for other members in the group to provide assistance if one or some group members cannot finish the assigned tasks (Kagan, 1985). In an examination of cooperative learning on student's learning, Hooper, Ward, Hannafin & Clark (1989) found that cooperation resulted in higher achievement when individual accountability was structured rather than when it was not and argued that a lack of individual accountability may reduce feelings of personal responsibility.…”
Section: Individual Accountabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data in a large amount of research shows, compared with competitive and individualistic efforts, cooperation has positive effects on a wider range of outcomes (Johnson & Johnson, 1991;Slavin, 1995;Kagan, 1999). People operating in a cooperative learning activity attain higher achievement level than those who function under competitive and individualistic learning structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this framework, Theodore Newcomb (1966) identified the peer group as the single most powerful influence in undergraduate education. Falchicov (2001) based on similar classifications devised by Bohlmeyer & Burke (1987) and Kagan (1985) describes the following peer-tutoring techniques:…”
Section: Cooperative Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%