Many have questioned the viability of sociology. Enrollments in sociology classes have declined and a few colleges and universities have abolished departments of sociology. Some of us suffer from a siege mentality and sociologists are fragmented. If the discipline is to reemerge as viable some changes will have to occur. Some think that the changes necessary are external to the discipline, but it is my assessment that the changes critical for the revitalization of the discipline are internal-namely, changes that transform the discipline from an anemic science into a robust scientific enterprise that serves humanity.A few sociologists, such as some postmodernists, think that a science of the social is antithetical to the welfare of humanity; many others think that sociology is a science that does indeed contribute to the welfare of humanity. My assessment is that sociology is not much of a science and as yet it has not made significant contributions to humanity. Nonetheless, I remain convinced that a robust science of the social can be developed and that a science of the social can benefit humanity. In order for that to occur, we will have to analyze our research methods and develop techniques that are more appropriately aligned to our objects of investigation.' If we do not do that we will not be able to formulate abstract principles about social phenomena. And, if we cannot formulate abstract principles we will have little to offer to humanity.The cornerstones of robust sciences are abstract (generic) principles about phenomena that human beings can use to organize their experiences and actions in a variety of situations. Abstract principles are applicable in diverse situations and provide human beings with opportunities to undertake enterprises that are not possible for those unacquainted with the principles. For example, those knowledgeable about Gregor Mendel's principle on the transmission of genetic information can undertake enterprises that the uninformed cannot. Perhaps sociologists will one day formulate a comparable principle.One reason sociologists have formulated few abstract principles is that our research procedures have not been aligned with our objects of investigation nor have we been especially diligent in assessing our procedures in light of their potential for generating knowledge.