Dimensions of apparel manufacturing strategy and production management

Lin, Shu‐Hwa; Moore, Mary Ann; Kincade, Doris H.; Avery, Carol E.

doi:10.1108/09556220210420336

Cited by 18 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 10 publications

(22 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(Lin et al, 2002 & Hunt, 1994). 개방적인 대화는 때때로 기업간의 관계의 혜택을 공유하는 것으로 발전시킬 수 있으 며, 이는 즉 신뢰를 보존시킬 수 있다 (Anderson & Narus, 1990).…”

Section: 또 협력기업의 제품이나 서비스의 품질이나 가격 등에 대한 불확실성은 신뢰와 몰입의 수준을 떨어unclassified

Antecedents and consequences of trust and commitment in apparel manufacturer-contractor relationships: The moderating role of length of relationship

Park¹,

Park²

2013

The Research Journal of the Costume Culture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examined regarding the moderating effect of length of relationship in the relationship among the antecedent variables (i.e., specific investment, opportunistic behavior, communication, uncertainty, interdependence, power imbalance, shared value, and flexibility) of trust and commitment, trust and commitment and firm performance and relationship satisfaction. A total of 128 apparel manufacturers participated in this study. Flexibility exerted the most positive effect on trust in short-term relationship, followed by specific investment. And opportunistic behavior was found to exert negative effect on trust. Commitment was found to be most negatively affected by power imbalance, followed by interdependence. Trust was shown to be significantly affected by communication, shared value and flexibility in short-term relationship. In the case of long-term relationship, commitment was shown to be significantly affected by uncertainty, interdependence, power imbalance and flexibility. Firm performance was positively affected by both trust and commitment. As for the effect of trust and commitment on relationship satisfaction, relationship satisfaction was also affected by both trust and commitment. In case the length of relationship, firm performance was affected by both trust and commitment. As for the effect of trust and commitment on relationship satisfaction, relationship satisfaction was also affected by both trust and commitment. The result of this research provides valuable data for making a concrete suggestion regarding the strategy for improving trust and commitment for the sake of the desirable relationship between apparel manufacturers and contractors.

show abstract

Section: 또 협력기업의 제품이나 서비스의 품질이나 가격 등에 대한 불확실성은 신뢰와 몰입의 수준을 떨어unclassified

Antecedents and consequences of trust and commitment in apparel manufacturer-contractor relationships: The moderating role of length of relationship

Park¹,

Park²

2013

The Research Journal of the Costume Culture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…6). Lin and Moor (2002) mentioned that the most common size of the apparel assembly systems consisted of 100-249 sewing machines and less 100 employees, reported by 29 plants in 1982. Lin focused on efficient production systems such as a bundle system, a progressive bundle system (PBS) that processed a specified sewing work by individual sewing machine based on standard allocated minutes (SAM), and a modular production system (MPS) based on multiskilled workers in the team.…”

Section: Physical Analysis Of Manufacturing Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Core Factors Governing Manufacturing Procedures and Systems

Lee¹,

Lim²,

Shim³

2009

Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reviews four factors involved in apparel and textile manufacturing procedures under international economic fluctuation. This work will be helpful to evaluate the efficiency of global manufacturing systems. Production costs including direct costs related to material and labor costs, and indirect costs associated with manufacturing running ones are significantly correlated to diverse visible and invisible elements such as infrastructure and the labor skills of foreign manufacturing areas, which might create an apparent difference in production costs. Manufacturers can consider how to improve the efficiency of manufacturing systems through a review of the co-relationship between manufacturing procedures and four factors such as manufacturing systems, production outsourcing types, manufacturing locations, and production costs in detail. In addition, the four factors are the core parameters of determining or contributing to the efficiency of a production schedule that is ultimately associated with the supply chain management (SCM) to efficiently conduct Quick Response (QR).

show abstract

“…The growing competition from low-cost regions has become an increasing concern for manufacturer in most industrialized countries. Drawing on the contingency theory, researchers agree that firms should seek a better fit with their customers' need as it will result in better performance of their operations [3]. The standardized style is related to the dimension of cost.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%