2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensions around the nutrient foramina of the tibia and fibula in the estimation of sex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the reliability of the predictions in the current study, the APNF and circumference at both levels have allocation accuracies that are comparable with other methods developed from positively identified individuals (Fasemore et al, 2018; Novak, 2016; Safont et al, 2000; Wu, 1989). The NF model provided slightly lower accurate sex allocation than the accuracy achieved by the midshaft model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning the reliability of the predictions in the current study, the APNF and circumference at both levels have allocation accuracies that are comparable with other methods developed from positively identified individuals (Fasemore et al, 2018; Novak, 2016; Safont et al, 2000; Wu, 1989). The NF model provided slightly lower accurate sex allocation than the accuracy achieved by the midshaft model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Several studies have used the nutrient foramen as an anatomical landmark on long bones for measurements employed successfully in sex discrimination (Fasemore et al, 2018; Mokoena, Billings, Bidmos, & Mazengenya, 2017; Safont et al, 2000). Notwithstanding, the use of the nutrient foramen of femur has not been previously investigated to assist with identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears that the inclusion of these measurements (epiphyseal and midshaft width) in these studies improved the prediction classification rates that were observed. Epiphyseal and diaphyseal width measurements have been shown to be significantly impacted by physical activity 73 and have been shown to exhibit sexual dimorphism 51,52,74,[81][82][83] compared to length measurements. However, Case and Ross 73 argued that since epiphyseal or diaphyseal measurements are probably more influenced by lifetime activity and that length measurements appear to have a more stable relationship, length measurements should be used in a forensic context where the lifetime activities of an unidentified individual are unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shape and size of leg bones are widely used in both bioarcheological and forensic contexts as sex indicators, e.g., [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]. Generally, males display larger and more robust tibiae and fibulae, with more robust lower extremities than females [ 5 , 6 ] due to a differentiation in environmental responses, hormonal surges, and physical loading patterns, which contribute to sexual variations of body shape and size/proportions [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%