2018
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b01669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensions and Global Twist of Single-Layer DNA Origami Measured by Small-Angle X-ray Scattering

Abstract: The rational design of complementary DNA sequences can be used to create nanostructures that self-assemble with nanometer precision. DNA nanostructures have been imaged by atomic force microscopy and electron microscopy. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) provides complementary structural information on the ensemble-averaged state of DNA nanostructures in solution. Here we demonstrate that SAXS can distinguish between different single-layer DNA origami tiles that look identical when immobilized on a mica surf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…OxDNA was parameterized to correctly reproduce the global twist of large 3D DNA structures 48,62 , suggesting that this twist is likely significant while in solution. We note, however, that the global twist of 2D DNA nanostructures in the bulk remains a topic of active research 63 , and more experimental data is needed to establish a better comparison of oxDNA parametrization with experimentally determined structures. Mean structures are also the best method to compare simulation results to cryo-EM maps.…”
Section: Mean Structure Determination and Rmsfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OxDNA was parameterized to correctly reproduce the global twist of large 3D DNA structures 48,62 , suggesting that this twist is likely significant while in solution. We note, however, that the global twist of 2D DNA nanostructures in the bulk remains a topic of active research 63 , and more experimental data is needed to establish a better comparison of oxDNA parametrization with experimentally determined structures. Mean structures are also the best method to compare simulation results to cryo-EM maps.…”
Section: Mean Structure Determination and Rmsfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search algorithm was used to design and synthesize a minimally-strained regular 20-helix nanotube with a defined inside and outside surface (Figure 2A Nanotubes were characterized with transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM) and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) ( Figure 2C; Supplementary Figure S3). With all imaging methods, the nanotubes appeared mostly as uniform rectangular structures whose lengths (TEM = 118.1 ± 2.0 nm, cryo-EM = 118.4 ± 2.9 nm, AFM = 121.1 ± 7.6 nm) ( Figure 2E; Figure S3), which likely results from affinity to the surface and mechanical compression by the AFM tip (49,57). This interaction also likely contributed to the higher ratio of structures which appear to have split and unrolled in AFM (13.2%) as compared to those seen in TEM (5.3%) micrographs (49).…”
Section: Design Synthesis and Characterization Of Regular Nanotubementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where X p is the crossover periodicity, θ i is the internal angle between any three sequential helices and D p is the periodicity of a DNA duplex, approximately 10.5 base-pairs (bp) per turn (4,56,57). For a regular DNA nanotube with n helices, θ i is the internal angle of a regular polygon with n sides:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The structural parameters obtained by SAXS are in good agreement with those determined by atomicf orce microscopy (AFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), andd ynamic light scattering (DLS). [20,21] Further,t he positioning of chiral gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) decorated on DNA nanotubes has been accurately determined by analyzing the pair-distance distribution function. Our resultsestablish SAXS as areliable structural analysism ethod for long DNA nanotubes and could assist in the rational design of these structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%