Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede With Inglehart

Abstract

Cross-national research on cultural differences across space and time intersects multiple disciplines but the prominence of concepts varies by academic fields. Hofstede’s dimensional concept of culture, to begin with, dominates in cross-cultural psychology and international management. Inglehart’s dynamic concept of culture, by contrast, prevails in sociology and political science. We argue that this disciplinary division is unfortunate because the two concepts are complementary, for which reason a synthesis rectifies their mutual weaknesses. Indeed, while Hofstede’s dimensional concept neglects cultural dynamics, Inglehart’s dynamic concept is dimensionally reductionist. We demonstrate empirically that combining these two concepts leads to an improved understanding of cultural differences. Inspired by Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, we use data from the European Value Studies and World Values Surveys for 495,011 individuals born between 1900 and 1999 in 110 countries and then show that change on these dimensions proceeds as Inglehart and his collaborators suggest. Most notably, younger generations have become more individualistic and more joyous. But even though economic development and generational replacement drive this cultural change, roughly half of the variation in national cultural orientations is unique to each country, due to lasting intercept differences in developmental trajectories that trace back to remote historic drivers. We discuss the implications for cross-national cultural research.

Dimensions of national culture associated with different trajectories of male and female mean body mass index in countries over 25 years

“…While it is acknowledged that culture does change over time (eg, due to secular changes, migration, and changing demographics), it was considered to be only slowly changing compared with the changes in population BMI. Studies have shown that while the culture of countries does change, the relative position of countries remains largely the same, and replication studies and other surveys have validated all the scores …”

“…Studies have shown that while the culture of countries does change, the relative position of countries remains largely the same, and replication studies and other surveys have validated all the scores. 39,34 The four covariates that were accounted for as potential confounders were income inequality (Gini coefficient), national income defined as the natural logarithm of per-person gross domestic product (GDP) adjusted for inflation and purchasing power, mean number of years of education, and the proportion of population living in urban areas. The Gini coefficient database was sourced from the World Bank.…”

Emergency medical staff’s perceptions on cultural value difference‐based teamwork issues: A phenomenological study in China

“…This theory is widely used in cross-cultural management (Beugelsdijk & Welzel, 2018), and cultural values are confirmed as an important factor influencing an individual's social behaviour and teamwork (Minkov & Hofstede, 2012;Smith, 2015). However, limited research has been carried out to determine how different cultural values affect teamwork in EDs.…”

National Culture and Africa Revisited: Ethnolinguistic Group Data From 35 African Countries

“…However, in spite of the differences in survey questions, some questions do address underlying value orientations in different ways. To determine which questions would be the most relevant for my research, I made use of the recent cultural dimension scores that were published by Beugelsdijk and Welzel (2018). Beugelsdijk and Welzel have attempted to synthesize the Hofstede/Minkov dimensions and those of Inglehart and Welzel into a three-dimensional model.…”