2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-018-0803-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensionality Reduction and Classification of Hyperspectral Images Using Object-Based Image Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison demonstrated that all methods are very accurate (more than 90% of accuracy); however, the two-step method achieved the best results [147] Land change Proposed an unsupervised method with an OB approach to improve the detection of changes using high-resolution images. This methodology achieved better results in comparison to other methods [148] SGD 15 (Life on Land) Invasive plants Developed an unsupervised method to detect and map invasive plants using RFs, which proved to be a successful approach [149] Landslide Compared an unsupervised PB and OB approach for landslide detection using VHR images and concluded that OB performed better than PB [150] Land cover Compared four OB classifiers for the classification of a suburban area with data provided by Landsat-8 and proved that SVM had the best performance among all [151] Land use Proposed OB approach for urban land use classification using VHR images [152] SGD 15 (Life on Land) Land cover Tested the performance of PB and OB classification with a hyperspectral dataset and found that OB was better than PB approach [153] Land use Compared an OB and PB approach using aero photogrammetric images and the results showed that OB classifier performed better compared to PB [154] Disasters and Renewable Energy; the Regression category covers the SDGs 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14 and 15, and the fields Water Quality, Pollution and Freshwater; and the Dimension Reduction category covers the SDGs 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15, and the fields Land Cover, Electricity and Software. Thus, the overall findings confirm the significance of EO and ML in pursuing the goals of SD providing an overview of methods and techniques that sustain the achievement of SDGs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison demonstrated that all methods are very accurate (more than 90% of accuracy); however, the two-step method achieved the best results [147] Land change Proposed an unsupervised method with an OB approach to improve the detection of changes using high-resolution images. This methodology achieved better results in comparison to other methods [148] SGD 15 (Life on Land) Invasive plants Developed an unsupervised method to detect and map invasive plants using RFs, which proved to be a successful approach [149] Landslide Compared an unsupervised PB and OB approach for landslide detection using VHR images and concluded that OB performed better than PB [150] Land cover Compared four OB classifiers for the classification of a suburban area with data provided by Landsat-8 and proved that SVM had the best performance among all [151] Land use Proposed OB approach for urban land use classification using VHR images [152] SGD 15 (Life on Land) Land cover Tested the performance of PB and OB classification with a hyperspectral dataset and found that OB was better than PB approach [153] Land use Compared an OB and PB approach using aero photogrammetric images and the results showed that OB classifier performed better compared to PB [154] Disasters and Renewable Energy; the Regression category covers the SDGs 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14 and 15, and the fields Water Quality, Pollution and Freshwater; and the Dimension Reduction category covers the SDGs 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15, and the fields Land Cover, Electricity and Software. Thus, the overall findings confirm the significance of EO and ML in pursuing the goals of SD providing an overview of methods and techniques that sustain the achievement of SDGs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where L obj is the radiance of the recorded sample, L ref the radiance of the certified reflectance standard and ρ ref the reflectance of the certified reflectance standard (Peddle et al, 2001;Steffens and Buddenbaum, 2013) Hyperspectral images were processed in ENVI Classic (Version 5.2, Exelis Visual Information Solutions, Boulder, Colorado, United States) following the workflow in Figure 1. In particular, we used a principal component analysis (PCA) to concentrate the spectral information in images and remove the correlation between neighboring bands (Rodarmel and Shan, 2002;Kavzoglu et al, 2018). PCA images show spectral spatial variability of different components on the soil surface and helps us to define number of endmembers (classes) (Steffens et al, 2014).…”
Section: Imvnir Scanning At 53 µM Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ground reference dataset including 16 LULC classes was collected through a field study in June 1992 [36]. The Indian Pines dataset has been employed in many publications to test and compare the performances of various algorithms [37,38]. The dataset is regarded as a challenging one for classification problems because of three major reasons.…”
Section: The Indian Pines Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%