1981
DOI: 10.5465/255836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensionality of the Job Descriptive Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore did not take norm values for our study but instead took the mean value of each dimension as points of reference. Yeager (1981) points out that the JDI is subject to variations unique to different samples, so we performed a confirmatory factor analysis before using the JDI. The scale on "work on present job" was clearly multi-factorial.…”
Section: European Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore did not take norm values for our study but instead took the mean value of each dimension as points of reference. Yeager (1981) points out that the JDI is subject to variations unique to different samples, so we performed a confirmatory factor analysis before using the JDI. The scale on "work on present job" was clearly multi-factorial.…”
Section: European Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It continues to be a major dependent variable in industrial, organizational, and social psychology. The Job Descriptive Index (JDI; Smith, Kendall, & Hulin, 1969/1985 has been reported to be the most frequently used measure of job satisfaction (De Meuse, 1986;O'Connor, Peters, & Gordon, 1978;Yeager, 1981). A computerized library search of The Social Sciences Citation Index and Psychological Abstracts revealed 454 articles referring to the JDI between January 1977 and November 1987.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Widely used in management studies (Yeager, 1981), the JDI allows for a comparison of VPSOs' job satisfaction with that of individuals in other occupations.…”
Section: Alaskan Village Public Safety Officers 333mentioning
confidence: 99%