2014
DOI: 10.1038/srep07565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensionality-dependent charge transport in close-packed nanoparticle arrays: from 2D to 3D

Abstract: Charge transport properties in close-packed nanoparticle arrays with thickness crossing over from two dimensions to three dimensions have been studied. The dimensionality transition of nanoparticle arrays was realized by continually printing spatially well-defined nanoparticle monolayers on top of the device in situ. The evolution of charge transport properties depending on the dimensionality has been investigated in both the Efros-Shaklovskii variable-range-hopping (ES-VRH) (low temperature) regime and the se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Similar effects are observed in ethanedithiol-exchanged PbSe NC-based FETs that are moderately conductive and ambipolar in the dark. 39…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Similar effects are observed in ethanedithiol-exchanged PbSe NC-based FETs that are moderately conductive and ambipolar in the dark. 39…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 For the crystals of didodecyl-BTBT isomers, an unprecedented m was observed for the compound with 2D transport and J max B 60 meV, while the compound with an extremely large J max = 129 meV but 1D transport exhibited a 340-fold lower m. 37 Moreover, the same trend of m increase with charge transport dimensionality was observed for arrays of nanoparticles. 38 Noteworthily, the hopping model was unable to describe the data from ref. 37 even qualitatively, and only the band model considering charge delocalization reproduced the strong positive impact of charge transport dimensionality on m.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refined models were then proposed by Abeles et al [21] by taking L 0 the inter-particle distance into account: where N is the number of NPs surrounding a given particle (e.g. N = 12 and 6 for a 3D and 2D dense fcc packing respectively [22]) and L 0 the inter-particle distance. In our case, the application of these models gives E C = e 2 /2C values ca.…”
Section: Arrhenius Type Temperature Dependence (γ = 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%