2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-019-0601-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensionality, Coordinate System and Reference Frame for Analysis of In-Situ Space Plasma and Field Data

Abstract: In the analysis of in-situ space plasma and field data, an establishment of the coordinate system and the frame of reference, helps us greatly simplify a given problem and provides the framework that enables a clear understanding of physical processes by ordering the experimental data. For example, one of the most important tasks of space data analysis is to compare the data with simulations and theory, which is facilitated by an appropriate choice of coordinate system and reference frame. While in simulations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
103
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
2
103
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent reconnection studies (e.g., Burch et al, ) used the LMN coordinate system to describe the fields and plasma signatures associated with the encounter of a reconnection region or X‐line. There are many ways to determine a suitable LMN coordinate system; most common methods are the minimum variance analysis (MVA; Sonnerup & Cahill, ) and the minimum directional derivative (MDD) techniques (Shi et al, , ). However, not shown here, either the MVA or MDD method is unable to accurately determine a stable LMN coordinate system for this particular X‐line encounter.…”
Section: Fields and Plasma Signatures Of Re‐reconnection X‐linementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent reconnection studies (e.g., Burch et al, ) used the LMN coordinate system to describe the fields and plasma signatures associated with the encounter of a reconnection region or X‐line. There are many ways to determine a suitable LMN coordinate system; most common methods are the minimum variance analysis (MVA; Sonnerup & Cahill, ) and the minimum directional derivative (MDD) techniques (Shi et al, , ). However, not shown here, either the MVA or MDD method is unable to accurately determine a stable LMN coordinate system for this particular X‐line encounter.…”
Section: Fields and Plasma Signatures Of Re‐reconnection X‐linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(top) Eigenvalues computed from the maximum directional derivative (MDD) method (Shi et al, , ) with blue, green, and red color representing the maximum, intermediate, and minimum magnetic field gradient, respectively. (middle) Corresponding maximum gradient eigenvectors from MDD method in Geocentric Solar Magnetospheric coordinate system.…”
Section: Fields and Plasma Signatures Of Re‐reconnection X‐linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full three-dimensional velocity of the reconnection layer is determined using the spatiotemporal difference method (STD) (Shi et al, 2006(Shi et al, , 2019. STD is applied to the ∼3.5-s interval surrounding the magnetopause crossing, as shown in Figures A1b and A1c.…”
Section: 1029/2020ja027985mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The propagation direction indicates the direction of propagation of the plasma sheet flapping; the normal direction indicates the tilt of the flapping plasma sheet relative to the X ‐ Y plane; and the speed in the normal direction indicates how fast the plasma sheet moves in the normal direction. Cluster multipoint measurements can be used to determine these parameters (Paschmann & Daly, 1998; Shi et al, 2019). A timing analysis was performed by considering the point at which B X = 0 (Russell et al, 1983) to calculate the normal direction and corresponding speed for the first, second, and third crossings.…”
Section: Observation and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%