2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00344.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensional variability of nonstandardized greater taper finger spreaders with matching gutta‐percha points

Abstract: The results of this study show that corresponding sizes of nonstandardized finger spreaders and gutta-percha cones have statistically significant differences. There were large dimensional variations within sizes and discrepancies between the nominal size and actual size. Thus, these discrepancies may cause problems during root canal filling.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A profile digital projector (PRAZIS) was used for obtaining measurements; this equipment has been previously used in dental research (24)(25)(26), in periodontics for the study of furcation anatomy (27), and in endodontics to test gutta-percha points and root canal filling materials microleakages (28,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A profile digital projector (PRAZIS) was used for obtaining measurements; this equipment has been previously used in dental research (24)(25)(26), in periodontics for the study of furcation anatomy (27), and in endodontics to test gutta-percha points and root canal filling materials microleakages (28,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main canal was simulated using a D-size finger spreader (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). This instrument had a length of 25 mm, a tip diameter of 0.35 mm, and a 0.06 taper (Briseñ o Marroquín et al 2001). Accessory canals were created by 0.2-mm stainless steel wires (Fig.…”
Section: Fabrication Of Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong cation-exchange (SCX) chromatography with its high loading capacity has become a standard separation technique in proteomics (Jiang et al, 2007;Peng et al, 2003). SCX chromatography is used as the first separation step of two-dimensional LC (2D-LC) prior to MS analysis (Briseno Marroquin et al, 2001;Davis et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%