1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-3796(98)00387-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensional analysis of critical heat flux in subcooled water flow under one-side heating conditions for fusion application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CHF can be conservatively estimated based on empirical correlations and experiment databases [3]. For the CP with the mentioned mass flow and the nominal operation conditions: static pressure of 10 bar, pressure drop of 6 bar and a maximum water inlet-outlet temperature difference of 70 ºC, a CHF of 47 MW/m² is calculated with the Tong-75 correlation for smooth circular pipes with the adjustment proposed by Boscary [4] for oneside, peaked heat load conditions; through the analysis of the relevant dimensionless numbers with experimental data.…”
Section: Subcooled Boiling To Enhance Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CHF can be conservatively estimated based on empirical correlations and experiment databases [3]. For the CP with the mentioned mass flow and the nominal operation conditions: static pressure of 10 bar, pressure drop of 6 bar and a maximum water inlet-outlet temperature difference of 70 ºC, a CHF of 47 MW/m² is calculated with the Tong-75 correlation for smooth circular pipes with the adjustment proposed by Boscary [4] for oneside, peaked heat load conditions; through the analysis of the relevant dimensionless numbers with experimental data.…”
Section: Subcooled Boiling To Enhance Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solid-fluid coupled model cannot simulate the subcooled boiling, so a "workaround" has been used to include this effect by adding a multiplying term to the input HTC function. As soon as the wall overheating, the temperature difference between the wall and that of the saturated vapor at the local pressure 13 bar (~180 °C) goes over a custom threshold of 10 °C, the HTC function grows exponentially, mimicking the effects of subcooled boiling [4]: lower wall overheating (40 °C difference) and higher heat flux (factor three) due to formation of vapor ( Figure 4).…”
Section: Description Of the Modelling Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modifying factor f peak is included to modify the wall heat flux apparent on the cylindrical surface of the coolant channel from the incident heat flux on the flat PFC tiles. This value is expected to be between 1.3 -2 [21,22,23,24]. The value of T w is determined via the heat transfer coefficient of the segment, defined in Section 2.2.4.…”
Section: Heat Sink Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A swirl tape in the tube is assumed using the modified empirical correlations of HTC evaluated by Gambill et al [10]. The range of application is that T w (wall temperature) −T sat (saturation temperature) = 40°C-90°C, P = 0.5-1.6 MPa, T in = 30°C-80°C, wall heat flux (WHF) <60 MW/m 2 , and twist ratio = 2-4 [11]. The pressure drop in pipe is obtained as 25.4 kPa per 0.1 m. With regard to the critical heat flux (CHF), the insertion of swirl tape tubes has been considered under water inlet conditions (ṁ = 0.39 kg/s, P in = 0.7 MPa, and T in = 35°C).…”
Section: Thermal Analysis By Htc Empirical Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%