2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dilution effect of different combustion residuals on laminar burning velocities and burned gas Markstein lengths of premixed methane/air mixtures at elevated temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mechanism validation was necessary to ensure that the predicted values by numerical model settings and the mechanism used in this study agreed well with the experimental data. Three kinetic mechanisms, including the San Diego mechanism, 25 GRI Mech 3.0 mechanism, 26 and DTU mechanism, 27 were used to calculate laminar burning velocity and compared with the experimental data in the literature. Because there is a rare experiment using H 2 O 2 in the CH 4 /air premixed flame, the numerical model will validate with the CH 4 /air-O 2 enrichment flame experiment of Han et al, 11 Mazas et al, 28 and de Persis et al 29 and the CH 4 /H 2 /air flame experiment of Nilsson et al, 30 Cai et al, 31 Donohue et al, 32 Khan et al, 33 Shang et al 34 and Hu et al 35 to accommodate the two scenarios used in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanism validation was necessary to ensure that the predicted values by numerical model settings and the mechanism used in this study agreed well with the experimental data. Three kinetic mechanisms, including the San Diego mechanism, 25 GRI Mech 3.0 mechanism, 26 and DTU mechanism, 27 were used to calculate laminar burning velocity and compared with the experimental data in the literature. Because there is a rare experiment using H 2 O 2 in the CH 4 /air premixed flame, the numerical model will validate with the CH 4 /air-O 2 enrichment flame experiment of Han et al, 11 Mazas et al, 28 and de Persis et al 29 and the CH 4 /H 2 /air flame experiment of Nilsson et al, 30 Cai et al, 31 Donohue et al, 32 Khan et al, 33 Shang et al 34 and Hu et al 35 to accommodate the two scenarios used in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was employed to comprehend the features of flames in small combustion spaces based on their flame propagation qualities, and the results were good when compared to the literature. According to Duva et al [30], the LBV values of CH4/air mixtures diluted with actual combustion residuals are comparable to those of N2 and H2O dilution, but the LBV of CH4 flames diluted with CO2 is much slower. Kochar et al [31] used the Bunsen burner method and the expanding spherical flame method.…”
Section: Laminar Flame Speed and Burning Velocitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Duva et al [30] Constant volume bomb The LBV of CH4 flames diluted with CO2 is much slower comparison with N2, H2O.…”
Section: Dong Et Al [27] Stagnation Flow Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned previously, in the case of beforehand emissions, the increase in the CO 2 content of the fresh mixture strongly affects the reactivity by modifying the stability limits of the combustors. To investigate the thermodynamics and kinetics effect of such CO 2 enrichment on the flame speed, several experimental and numerical laminar flame investigations have been performed in the literature (Halter et al, 2009;Galmiche et al, 2011;Chan et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2020;Duva et al, 2020;Xie et al, 2020). Xie et al (2020) numerically isolated different contributions that compete for such laminar flame speed (LFS) reduction, showing that CO 2 is far from being inert from the kinetics perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%