Dilepton production in pp and CC collisions with HADES

Fröhlich, I.; Agakishiev, G.; Agodi, C.; Bałanda, A.; Bellia, G.; Belver, D.; Belyaev, A.; Blanco, A.; Böhmer, M.; Boyard, J. L.; Braun‐Munzinger, P.; Cabanelas, P.; Castro, E.; Chernenko, S.; Christ, T.; Destefanis, M.; Díaz, Julio Pérez; Dohrmann, F.; Eberl, T.; Fabbietti, L.; Fateev, O.; Finocchiaro, P.; Fonte, P.; Friese, J.; Galatyuk, T.; Garzón, J. A.; Gernhäuser, R.; Gilardi, C.; Golubeva, M.; González-Díaz, D.; Grosse, E.; Guber, F.; Hadjivasiliou, C; Heilmann, Manuel; Hennino, T.; Holzmann, R.; Ierusalimov, A.; Iori, I.; Ivashkin, A.; Jurković, M.; Kämpfer, B.; Kanaki, K.; Karavicheva, T.; Kirschner, D.; Köenig, I.; Koenig, W.; Kolb, B. W.; Kötte, R.; Kożuch, A.; Křížek, F.; Krücken, R.; Куглер, А.; Kühn, W.; Kurepin, A.; Lamas-Valverde, J.; Lang, S.; Lange, S.; Lopes, L.; Mangiarotti, A.; Marin, J. C.; Markert, J.; Metag, V.; Michalska, B.; Mishra, D.; Morinière, E.; Mousa, J.; Müntz, C.; Naumann, L.; Novotny, R.; Otwinowski, J.; Pachmayer, Y.; Pałka, M.; Pechenov, V.; Pechenova, O.; Cavalcanti, T. Pérez; Pietraszko, J.; Przygoda, W.; Ramstein, B.; Reshetin, A.; Roy‐Stéphan, M.; Rustamov, A.; Sadovsky, A.; Sailer, B.; Salabura, P.; Schmah, A.; Simon, R. S.; Spataro, S.; Spruck, B.; Ströbele, H.; Stroth, J.; Sturm, C.; Sudol, M.; Teilab, K.; Tlustý, P.; Traxler, M.; Trębacz, R.; Tsertos, H.; Veretenkin, I.; Wagner, V.; Wen, Hao; Wiśniowski, M.; Wójcik, Tomasz; Wüstenfeld, J.; Zanevsky, Y.; Zumbruch, P.

doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72516-9_116

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Postulate two was that agitating the cells, to increase initial proximity, would improve the chances of establishing initial correlations (before the final split), whether by direct contact or mediators. A third postulate was that splitting cells in culture, without the high intensity field, maintained quantum correlations [63][64][65][66]. A fourth postulate was that exposure to a high intensity, LFEF would disrupt correlations between spatially separated populations [44].…”

Section: Ivf Postulate In Design Of the Top Down Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Can We Advance Macroscopic Quantum Systems Outside the Framework of Complex Decoherence Theory?

Brezinski

Rupnick

2014

J Comput Sci Syst Biol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Macroscopic quantum systems (MQS) are macroscopic systems driven by quantum rather than classical mechanics, a long studied area with minimal success till recently. Harnessing the benefits of quantum mechanics on a macroscopic level would revolutionize fields ranging from telecommunication to biology, the latter focused on here for reasons discussed. Contrary to misconceptions, there are no known physical laws that prevent the development of MQS. Instead, they are generally believed universally lost in complex systems from environmental entanglements (decoherence). But we argue success is achievable MQS with decoherence compensation developed, naturally or artificially, from top-down rather current reductionist approaches. This paper advances the MQS field by a complex systems approach to decoherence. First, why complex system decoherence approaches (top-down) are needed is discussed. Specifically, complex adaptive systems (CAS) are not amenable to reductionist models (and their master equations) because of emergent behaviour, approximation failures, not accounting for quantum compensatory mechanisms, ignoring path integrals, and the subentity problem. In addition, since MQS must exist within the context of the classical world, where rapid decoherence and prolonged coherence are both needed. Nature has already demonstrated this for quantum subsystems such as photosynthesis and magnetoreception. Second, we perform a preliminary study that illustrates a top-down approach to potential MQS. In summary, reductionist arguments against MQS are not justifiable. It is more likely they are not easily detectable in large intact classical systems or have been destroyed by reductionist experimental set-ups. This complex systems decoherence approach, using top down investigations, is critical to paradigm shifts in MQS research both in biological and non-biological systems.

show abstract

Section: Ivf Postulate In Design Of the Top Down Studymentioning

confidence: 99%