2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dilemma Analysis of China Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution Based on Peasants’ Household Surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, China’s agricultural production model is featured with significant “high output, low efficiency, and high input” because of lower occupancy volume of per capita cultivated land, relatively single rural economy, and pressure on food security. In this way, agricultural production shows a larger input dependency on pollution elements like chemical fertilizers (Liu et al., 2019; Rao et al., 2012). Even though the utilization of these pollution elements can enhance agricultural production efficiency, ensure long‐term efficient supply of agricultural products, and bring higher economic incomes to farmers, it gives rise to relatively severe environmental pollution issues.…”
Section: Research Methods and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At present, China’s agricultural production model is featured with significant “high output, low efficiency, and high input” because of lower occupancy volume of per capita cultivated land, relatively single rural economy, and pressure on food security. In this way, agricultural production shows a larger input dependency on pollution elements like chemical fertilizers (Liu et al., 2019; Rao et al., 2012). Even though the utilization of these pollution elements can enhance agricultural production efficiency, ensure long‐term efficient supply of agricultural products, and bring higher economic incomes to farmers, it gives rise to relatively severe environmental pollution issues.…”
Section: Research Methods and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the grounds of sufficiently harmonizing the relationship among nature, economy, and society, pollution discharge intensity is scientifically and reasonably evaluated (Adu & Kumarasamy, 2018). However, characterized by scattered sources, complicated mechanism, lasting pollution, as well as spatial‐temporal uncertainty and randomness of ANPSP, it increased the difficulty of evaluating its discharge intensity (Chen et al., 2019; Ongley et al., 2010; Rao et al., 2012; Yang & Lin, 2019). Particularly, due to the small sample size for studying China’s ANPSP, most studies gave priority to microcosmic regional studies or short‐term panel data (Cai et al., 2013; Wang, Shen, et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…China has a large population and the area of arable land per capita is small. The quality of this land is not high, and agricultural growth has long relied on the excessive use of chemicals [ 17 , 18 , 19 ], which has severely overstretched the available arable land and produced large amounts of carbon emissions. These issues demonstrate how serious the challenges are for the agricultural eco-system [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive promotion and application of environmentally friendly agricultural practices are the most direct and effective way to control farmland non-point source pollution and establish sustainable and healthy agricultural ecosystems (Benyehoshua 2005;Wang 2011; Rao et al 2012;Fu et al 2013). Hence, the Chinese government and researchers have promoted various such practices, including (in Chinese rice cultivation) scientific irrigation, soil testing and formula fertilization, side-bar fertilization, rational application of combinations of organic and inorganic fertilizers, low-toxicity and low-persistence microbial pesticides, green crop pest control techniques, returning straw to fields, ecological ditch construction, and conservation buffer strips.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%