1986
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.56.1230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dilaton and Chiral-Symmetry Breaking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
263
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
263
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, finiteness of the dynamically generated mass for Λ → ∞ forces non perturbative QED to be consistently defined only for those values of α and λ which lie on the critical surface. This is a simple corollary of the argument laid out in [6]. Note that as we employ a model for the vacuum polarization, the running coupling is not our prediction.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, finiteness of the dynamically generated mass for Λ → ∞ forces non perturbative QED to be consistently defined only for those values of α and λ which lie on the critical surface. This is a simple corollary of the argument laid out in [6]. Note that as we employ a model for the vacuum polarization, the running coupling is not our prediction.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A classic example is the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model which was proposed some thirty years ago by Nambu and Jona-Lasinio [7] (see also [8]) as a quantum field theory which exhibits dynamical chiral symmetry breaking for sufficiently strong attractive fermionanti-fermion interactions in four (space-time) dimensions. The study of related models has recently seen a revival with speculations that the symmetry breaking mechanisms which it describes could be used in the standard model to describe the Higgs particle as a top quark condensate [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eq. (14) is analogous to the gap equation in the continuum theory [5] containing gauge and four-fermion interactions. In fact, the infrared scale m = Σ c (0), i.e., the v.e.v.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%