2020
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnaa093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dilations of q-Commuting Unitaries

Abstract: Let $q = e^{i \theta } \in \mathbb{T}$ (where $\theta \in \mathbb{R}$), and let $u,v$ be $q$-commuting unitaries, that is, $u$ and $v$ are unitaries such that $vu = quv$. In this paper, we find the optimal constant $c = c_{\theta }$ such that $u,v$ can be dilated to a pair of operators $c U, c V$, where $U$ and $V$ are commuting unitaries. We show that $$\begin{equation*} c_{\theta} = \frac{4}{\|u_{\theta}+u_{\theta}^*+v_{\theta}+v_{\theta}^*\|}, \end{equation*}$$where $u_{\theta }, v_{\theta }$ are the univer… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is originally due to Kesten [17,Theorem 3], who gives a probabilistic proof; in his notation, h f = 2dM (G, A, P ) where G is the free group F d , A the canonical set of generators, P assigns probability 1 2d to each generator, and M is the (infinite) matrix of transition propabilities of the associated symmetric random walk on G. See also [1, Theorem IV J] for a C*-algebraic proof (h f is a free operator in the sense [1, Definition III B] by [1, Theorem III E]) and [19] for a proof using free probability (the norm can be calculated from the general formula for the norm of free operators as in [1]). In this case, we can argue similar to [14,Theorem 6.1]. Let u = u f denote a d-tuple of free Haar unitaries.…”
Section: Dilations and The Free Haar Unitariesmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations

Dilations of unitary tuples

Gerhold,
Pandey,
Shalit
et al. 2020
Preprint
Self Cite
“…This result is originally due to Kesten [17,Theorem 3], who gives a probabilistic proof; in his notation, h f = 2dM (G, A, P ) where G is the free group F d , A the canonical set of generators, P assigns probability 1 2d to each generator, and M is the (infinite) matrix of transition propabilities of the associated symmetric random walk on G. See also [1, Theorem IV J] for a C*-algebraic proof (h f is a free operator in the sense [1, Definition III B] by [1, Theorem III E]) and [19] for a proof using free probability (the norm can be calculated from the general formula for the norm of free operators as in [1]). In this case, we can argue similar to [14,Theorem 6.1]. Let u = u f denote a d-tuple of free Haar unitaries.…”
Section: Dilations and The Free Haar Unitariesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Thus, we seek the convex combination t k x Θ,k of minimal norm. In [14], the case d = 2 was studied. With u θ denoting the universal pair satisfying u θ,2 u θ,1 = e iθ u θ,1 u θ,2 , the main result (Theorem 6.3) in that paper can be stated as follows:…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation

Dilations of unitary tuples

Gerhold,
Pandey,
Shalit
et al. 2020
Preprint
Self Cite
“…The above corollary is powerful enough to prove quite easily that for every selfadjoint ‐polynomial, the spectrum σ(pfalse(uΘfalse)) is a 12‐Hölder continuous map, and from this one easily obtains the known results that the higher dimensional rotation algebras AΘ form a continuous field. We will not elaborate here on this method (see [15, Section 4] for details in the case d=2), since much stronger conclusions can be drawn by invoking an ingenious technique from [16].…”
Section: Noncommutative Tori: Continuity Of the Dilation Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem 1.1 and similar problems have come up in the setting of relaxation of spectrahedral inclusion problems [17], in interpolation problems for completely positive maps and the study of the structure of operator systems [10, 11], and fit in the general paradigm of studying operator theory through dilations [30]. More recently, such problems have turned out to be connected to quantum information theory [6, 7] as well as other aspects of mathematical physics and C*‐algebras [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%