2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cocis.2010.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dilational rheology of protein films adsorbed at fluid interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
80
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the proteins present in Na-CAS, b-casein tends to dominate on the interface due to its increased surface activity (Jourdain et al, 2009). However, due to its increased flexibility, almost two fold higher than globular proteins, this protein component tends to generate interfaces with a low dilatational modulus (Lucassen-Reynders, Benjamins, & Fainerman, 2010). The presence of chitosan at the interfaces did not affect the rheological properties of the adsorbed biopolymer films (Fig.…”
Section: Adsorption Of Sodium Caseinate/chitosan Complexes At Oil/ Wamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Among the proteins present in Na-CAS, b-casein tends to dominate on the interface due to its increased surface activity (Jourdain et al, 2009). However, due to its increased flexibility, almost two fold higher than globular proteins, this protein component tends to generate interfaces with a low dilatational modulus (Lucassen-Reynders, Benjamins, & Fainerman, 2010). The presence of chitosan at the interfaces did not affect the rheological properties of the adsorbed biopolymer films (Fig.…”
Section: Adsorption Of Sodium Caseinate/chitosan Complexes At Oil/ Wamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…2b) could be attributable to a restructuring and rearrangement of the interface protein with modification of the relaxation mechanisms that take place at an interface level, which contributes to greater elasticity of the film (Fig. 3) [27]. Moreover, the contribution of increased protein-protein interaction cannot be ruled out.…”
Section: Interfacial Viscoelasticitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…b-Lactoglobulin (BLG), and proteins in general, readily adsorb at fluid interfaces forming a visco-elastic network [1][2][3][4][5]. Concerning the influence of the hydrophobic phase, the adsorption is more intensive at the water/oil interface compared to the water/air (W/ A) surface leading to smaller molar areas [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the influence of the hydrophobic phase, the adsorption is more intensive at the water/oil interface compared to the water/air (W/ A) surface leading to smaller molar areas [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. This fact is attributed to the stronger cohesive interaction between the organic molecules and the protein's hydrophobic segments which leads to penetration of such segments into the oil phase thus changing the conformation of the protein in the adsorbed state compared to that at the W/A surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%