2008
DOI: 10.4321/s1130-01082008001000006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dilatación de la papila de Vater con balón de gran diámetro para la extracción de coledocolitiasis

Abstract: Papillary dilation with a large balloon is an effective, safe, and easy technique for the retrieval of difficult common bile-duct stones. The procedure neither adds time to the exploration, nor increases complications, and obviates the need for mechanical lithotripsy in a majority of patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) combined with limited EST (EPLBD+EST) has been reported to be effective and safe for the removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones 5,13. Although this method has had promising results, EST is still a problematic procedure in patients with prior Billroth II gastrectomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) combined with limited EST (EPLBD+EST) has been reported to be effective and safe for the removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones 5,13. Although this method has had promising results, EST is still a problematic procedure in patients with prior Billroth II gastrectomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo su ventana terapéutica es estrecha, obligando a un ajuste perfecto de las dosis para evitar provocar deterioro de la función cardiorrespiratoria; por dicho motivo y por el hecho de no disponer de un antídoto, el empleo de propofol por médicos no anestesistas ha suscitado controversia. No obstante, en los últimos años han sido muy numerosos los estudios publicados que demostraban una seguridad y efectividad aceptables cuando la sedación con propofol durante procedimientos endoscópicos era controlada directamente por endoscopistas o por enfermeras debidamente entrenadas, si bien es cierto que la mayoría de dichos estudios se llevaron cabo durante procedimientos de endoscopia básica y en pacientes de riesgo anestésico bajo, siendo escasos los trabajos referidos a endoscopia avanzada o en pacientes con riesgo anestési-co superior (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…For this reason and because of not having an antidote, the non-anesthesiologist use of propofol by doctors has raised controversy. However, in recent years numerous studies have been published and they have demonstrated an acceptable safety and efficacy when propofol sedation during endoscopic procedures was controlled directly by endoscopists or by properly trained nurses, although most of these studies were carried out during basic endoscopic procedures, and in lower anesthetic risk patients, with few studies relating to advanced endoscopy or in patients with a higher anesthetic risk (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations