2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2015.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diimine ligand structure effects on photophysical properties of tricarbonyl rhenium(I) complexes having arylborane charge transfer units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have focused on triarylboranes as a choice for synthetic modulation of the spectroscopic and photophysical properties of transition metal complexes. , Owing to the presence of the vacant p-orbital on the boron atom (p­(B)) in a triarylborane, a class of transition metal complexes having a triarylborane group(s) in the periphery of the ligand(s) shows fascinating excited-state properties, characterized by the synergistic interactions between MLCT in a transition metal complex and the intramolecular CT interaction between the π-orbital of the aryl group (π­(aryl)) and p­(B) (π­(aryl)–p­(B) CT) in the triarylborane group. As a typical example, we reported that the [Ru­(phen) 3 ] 2+ (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline) derivative having a (dimesityl)­boryldurylethynyl (DBDE) group at the 4- or 5-position of one of the three phen ligands showed intense MLCT absorption/emission and a long-lived excited state compared with [Ru­(phen) 3 ] 2+ : 4BRu 2+ ([Ru­(4-DBDE-phen)­(phen) 2 ] 2+ ), ε 473 (molar absorption coefficient at 473 nm) = 2.6 × 10 4 M –1 cm –1 (M = mol/dm 3 ), Φ em = 0.11, and τ em (emission lifetime) = 12 μs; 5BRu 2+ ([Ru­(5-DBDE-phen) (phen) 2 ] 2+ ), ε 448 = 1.7 × 10 4 M –1 cm –1 , Φ em = 0.11, and τ em = 1.2 μs; [Ru­(phen) 3 ] 2+ , ε 445 = 1.7 × 10 4 M –1 cm –1 , Φ em = 0.045, and τ em = 0.42 μs in CH 3 CN at 298 K .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have focused on triarylboranes as a choice for synthetic modulation of the spectroscopic and photophysical properties of transition metal complexes. , Owing to the presence of the vacant p-orbital on the boron atom (p­(B)) in a triarylborane, a class of transition metal complexes having a triarylborane group(s) in the periphery of the ligand(s) shows fascinating excited-state properties, characterized by the synergistic interactions between MLCT in a transition metal complex and the intramolecular CT interaction between the π-orbital of the aryl group (π­(aryl)) and p­(B) (π­(aryl)–p­(B) CT) in the triarylborane group. As a typical example, we reported that the [Ru­(phen) 3 ] 2+ (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline) derivative having a (dimesityl)­boryldurylethynyl (DBDE) group at the 4- or 5-position of one of the three phen ligands showed intense MLCT absorption/emission and a long-lived excited state compared with [Ru­(phen) 3 ] 2+ : 4BRu 2+ ([Ru­(4-DBDE-phen)­(phen) 2 ] 2+ ), ε 473 (molar absorption coefficient at 473 nm) = 2.6 × 10 4 M –1 cm –1 (M = mol/dm 3 ), Φ em = 0.11, and τ em (emission lifetime) = 12 μs; 5BRu 2+ ([Ru­(5-DBDE-phen) (phen) 2 ] 2+ ), ε 448 = 1.7 × 10 4 M –1 cm –1 , Φ em = 0.11, and τ em = 1.2 μs; [Ru­(phen) 3 ] 2+ , ε 445 = 1.7 × 10 4 M –1 cm –1 , Φ em = 0.045, and τ em = 0.42 μs in CH 3 CN at 298 K .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the nonradiative decay of 3 MLCT* occurs through the 3 dd* state, the τ em value of a Ru II complex in general decreases as the temperature ( T ) increases. In contrast, the emission lifetime of 1 is almost independent of T (see Figure ), similarly to those of 2 and other DBDE‐appended polypyridyl Ru II and Re I complexes , . Surprisingly, the τ em value of 1 remains very long even at 400 K ( τ em = 6.6 µs).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…We have focused on chemical decorations of an MLCT-type transition metal complex by a triarylborane unit(s). Several research groups have also reported characteristic spectroscopic and photophysical properties of aryiborane-decorated platinum­(II), iridium­(III), ruthenium­(II), , zinc­(II), , copper­(I), , rhenium­(I), , and gold­(I) complexes . In the transition metal complex possessing a triarylborane-appended ligand(s), the intramolecular CT transition from the π-orbital of the aryl group (π­(aryl)) to the vacant p-orbital on the boron atom (p­(B)), π­(aryl)–p­(B) CT, in the triarylborane moiety synergistically participates in the MLCT transition in the metal-complex moiety, and as a result, the complex shows intriguing spectroscopic and excited-state properties. We recently reported the characteristic emission properties of a homoleptic arylborane–ruthenium­(II) complex ([Ru­(B 2 bpy) 3 ] 2+ ), in which six (dimesityl)­boryldurylethynyl (DBDE) groups were introduced to [Ru­(bpy) 3 ] 2+ (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) at the 4- and 4′-positions of the three bpy ligands: B 2 bpy = 4,4′-(DBDE) 2 -2,2′-bipyridine . In CH 3 CN at 298 K, [Ru­(B 2 bpy) 3 ] 2+ shows extremely intense and long-lived emission (Φ em = 0.43 and τ em = 1.7 μs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%