2020
DOI: 10.30699/jambs.28.128.156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dignity Therapy Improves Hope and Quality of Life in Cancer Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four studies ( 15 17 , 28 ) were included to compare the results of dignity between intervention group and control group. QOL was measured using EORTC Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC–QLQ–C30) or EuroQOL (EQ-5D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Four studies ( 15 17 , 28 ) were included to compare the results of dignity between intervention group and control group. QOL was measured using EORTC Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC–QLQ–C30) or EuroQOL (EQ-5D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies that reported the effects of dignity therapy on the quality of life of terminally ill patients ( 15 17 , 28 ) were meta-analyzed, and the results showed dignity therapy did not have a significant effect on quality of life. Three of the four studies included in the analysis were measured using the 2-item QOL tool, one study measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), and the other one assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the largest randomised controlled trial conducted with terminally ill patients found no significant differences between groups on dignity-related distress, psychological distress, spiritual well-being and quality of life at follow-up 14. Although some studies showed the ineffectiveness of dignity therapy,15–17 others found that this intervention was effective in reducing demoralisation and dignity-related distress18 and depression and anxiety symptoms,19 20 and improving quality of life 21. It has been suggested that these mixed findings might be due to the lack of specific instruments assessing the effectiveness of dignity therapy,12 measures not sensitive enough to detect psychological changes,13 selection of outcomes not directly addressed by dignity therapy (eg, measures including physical symptoms and functions) and the possibility of delayed effects7 as well as ‘ceiling and floor’ effects 7 10 12.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%