1981
DOI: 10.1080/15374418109533032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digits forward and digits backward as two separate tests: Normative data on 1567 school children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The descriptive statistics for task performance are presented in Table 3. Twin performance on Digit Span aligned well with normative Forward and Backward results in eight year old boys and girls (Table 3) [49]. Twin performance on the flanker task (Table 3) was also in normative ranges based on previous reports [50].…”
Section: Preliminary Analysessupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The descriptive statistics for task performance are presented in Table 3. Twin performance on Digit Span aligned well with normative Forward and Backward results in eight year old boys and girls (Table 3) [49]. Twin performance on the flanker task (Table 3) was also in normative ranges based on previous reports [50].…”
Section: Preliminary Analysessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This procedure allowed us to use gene methylation summary statistics to characterize the data and reduce the number of statistical tests to avoid Type 1 errors. PCA is an established technique that has been used to reduce high-dimensionality of methylation data [37,[48][49][50]. PCA projects data into new orthogonal directions corresponding to the directions of maximum variance (not amount).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may explain prior observations that only DSB (not DST or DSF) was capable of distinguishing between clinical subgroups (i.e., ADHD; Rosenthal et al, 2006 ). Thus, our results validate concerns in the behavioral literature that using DST may obscure our understanding of the underlying neural differences ( Gardner, 1981 , Reynolds, 1997 ). At a minimum, we suggest future studies employing the DST should also examine both DSF and DSB.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Performance for both forward-and backward-recall order was assessed. Studies in the verbal domain have shown that forward-recall of digits is better than backward-recall (Gardner, 1981), because reversing the order of a verbal sequence requires that the input be transformed and thus makes additional demands on executive processing resources (Scho®eld & Ashman, 1986). To date, only a handful of studies have compared forward and backward-recall with visuospatial material, with inconclusive results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%