2016
DOI: 10.1111/isj.12114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digitally enabled disaster response: the emergence of social media as boundary objects in a flooding disaster

Abstract: In recent times, social media has been increasingly playing a critical role in response actions following natural catastrophes. From facilitating the recruitment of volunteers during an earthquake to supporting emotional recovery after a hurricane, social media has demonstrated its power in serving as an effective disaster response platform. Based on a case study of Thailand flooding in 2011 – one of the worst flooding disasters in more than 50 years that left the country severely impaired – this paper provide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
79
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
4
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical research has explored the role of many different objects, including software specifications and project management tools (Barrett & Oborn, 2010), architectures (Bergman, Lyytinen, & Mark, 2007), drawings and models (Yoo, Boland, & Lyytinen, 2006), work products such as graphical presentations or documents (Kellogg, Orlikowski, & Yates, 2006;Newell & Edelman, 2008), timelines (Yakura, 2002), and social media (Tim, Pan, Ractham, & Kaewkitipong, 2017). While early research had a strong focus on objects and their properties (Bergman et al, 2007;Carlile, 2002), other studies have shifted attention towards what people do with objects, ie, use practices (e.g., Ewenstein & Whyte, 2009;Levina & Vaast, 2005;Nicolini, Mengis, & Swan, 2012).…”
Section: Knowledge Boundaries and Boundary Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical research has explored the role of many different objects, including software specifications and project management tools (Barrett & Oborn, 2010), architectures (Bergman, Lyytinen, & Mark, 2007), drawings and models (Yoo, Boland, & Lyytinen, 2006), work products such as graphical presentations or documents (Kellogg, Orlikowski, & Yates, 2006;Newell & Edelman, 2008), timelines (Yakura, 2002), and social media (Tim, Pan, Ractham, & Kaewkitipong, 2017). While early research had a strong focus on objects and their properties (Bergman et al, 2007;Carlile, 2002), other studies have shifted attention towards what people do with objects, ie, use practices (e.g., Ewenstein & Whyte, 2009;Levina & Vaast, 2005;Nicolini, Mengis, & Swan, 2012).…”
Section: Knowledge Boundaries and Boundary Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, SNS offer new ways for people to participate during crisis events, including seeking local and timely information, quickly activating their social networks, and making these efforts more visible. These features enable a new form of citizen journalism and active public participation during various crisis events [38], such as earthquakes (e.g., [43,70,88]), floods (e.g., [5,77,79]), terrorist attacks (e.g., [10,14,51]), hurricanes (e.g., [20,44,58]), and campus shootings (e.g., [27,46,79]). Different SNS are used in crisis-related communication, such as popular SNS like Facebook and Twitter but also more specific crisis-related platforms like Ushahidi [72].…”
Section: Social Networking Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that people can collaborate effectively online without a central control mechanism during crisis circumstances [67]. These activities, which often happen simultaneously, depend on or should at least not interfere with each other [77]. Activities can take place both online (e.g., referencing other important content) and offline (e.g., delivering food and other crisis relief efforts).…”
Section: Self-organization During Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using social media data from a real situation, we analyse how individual actors framed their circumstances in communication with one another and how this affected their subsequent interpretation and decisions as the disaster unfolded. In particular, we aim to observe patterns of altruistic reinforcing behaviours in conjunction with the emergent problem solving approach of the online communities as a response to the disaster (Bui, 2016;Kaufhold & Reuter, 2016;Sebastian & Bui, 2009;Tim, Pan, Ractham, & Kaewkitipong, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%