Digitally Disconnected: Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives on the Digital Divide and Potential Solutions

Abstract

Background As telemedicine utilization increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, divergent usage patterns for video and audio-only telephone visits emerged. Older, low-income, minority, and non-English speaking Medicaid patients are at highest risk of experiencing technology access and digital literacy barriers. This raises concern for disparities in health care access and widening of the “digital divide,” the separation of those with technological access and knowledge and those without. While studies demonstrate correlation between racial and socioeconomic demographics and technological access and ability, individual patients’ perspectives of the divide and its impacts remain unclear. Objective We aimed to interview patients to understand their perspectives on (1) the definition, causes, and impact of the digital divide; (2) whose responsibility it is to address this divide, and (3) potential solutions to mitigate the digital divide. Methods Between December 2020 and March 2021, we conducted 54 semistructured telephone interviews with adult patients and parents of pediatric patients who had virtual visits (phone, video, or both) between March and September 2020 at the University of Chicago Medical Center (UCMC) primary care clinics. A grounded theory approach was used to analyze interview data. Results Patients were keenly aware of the digital divide and described impacts beyond health care, including employment, education, community and social contexts, and personal economic stability. Patients described that individuals, government, libraries, schools, health care organizations, and even private businesses all shared the responsibility to address the divide. Proposed solutions to address the divide included conducting community technology needs assessments and improving technology access, literacy training, and resource awareness. Recognizing that some individuals will never cross the divide, patients also emphasized continued support of low-tech communication methods and health care delivery to prevent widening of the digital divide. Furthermore, patients viewed technology access and literacy as drivers of the social determinants of health (SDOH), profoundly influencing how SDOH function to worsen or improve health disparities. Conclusions Patient perspectives provide valuable insight into the digital divide and can inform solutions to mitigate health and resulting societal inequities. Future work is needed to understand the digital needs of disconnected individuals and communities. As clinical care and delivery continue to integrate telehealth, studies are needed to explore whether having a video or audio-only phone visit results in different patient outcomes and utilization. Advocacy efforts to disseminate public and private resources can also expand device and broadband internet access, improve technology literacy, and increase funding to support both high- and low-tech forms of health care delivery for the disconnected.

Telehealth and the Digital Divide: Identifying Potential Care Gaps in Video Visit Use

“…Recent research on the digital divide shows that decreased access and ability to utilize technology exacerbates inequality and calls for health care organizations to join in the solution [ 6 ]. Our work answers this call.…”

The Logistics of Medication and Patient Flow in Video-Based Virtual Clinics During a Sudden COVID-19 Outbreak in Taiwan: Observational Study

“…Part of the delay in the increase in video-based virtual clinic visits may be because most patients were waiting for a rapid decrease in the daily number of new COVID-19 cases. However, other potential barriers to prevent the prompt conversion to and uptake of virtual clinics still exist [ 20 , 21 ]. A guide to overcoming these barriers and to facilitate the implementation of virtual clinics has been proposed [ 22 ].…”

Managing Obesity in Young Children: A Multiple Methods Study Assessing Feasibility, Acceptability, and Implementation of a Multicomponent, Family-Based Intervention

“…Transitioning to an online/virtual format would address some practical challenges ( e.g. , parking costs, travel time) and might therefore increase accessibility of group sessions; however, it has been suggested that web-based interventions may actually exacerbate inequities across sociodemographic groups and the “digital divide.” 47 , 48 To our knowledge, the effectiveness of virtual small group sessions in pediatric weight management has not been studied. In adults, recent studies suggest that lifestyle interventions delivered via videoconference are at least as effective as standard interventions 49–51 ; however, intervention or participant characteristics that contribute to the effectiveness of virtual small group sessions are not well understood.…”