Digitalization and subjective wellbeing in Europe

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to analyze the effect of digitalization on 28 European countries’ subjective wellbeing by using macro (aggregate level) indicators. Design/methodology/approach The research investigates the impact of digitalization (Digital Economy and Society Index [DESI]) on life satisfaction through its components. The study uses several models based on the two-stage least squares method. Findings The findings show that internet connectivity, use of the internet and integrated digital technology are positively related to life satisfaction. Furthermore, the results revealed that human capital and digital public services are negatively associated with it. The study also suggested that digital skills, e-health, and e-government services do not necessarily increase an individual’s life satisfaction level. The internet’s use appeared to be the most effective digitalization component in affecting life satisfaction in Europe. Research limitations/implications The study is based on the DESI index from 2014 to 2019. Although it does not influence the outcome, future research may consider additional indexes such as Digital Adoption Index and Digital Transformation Index and extend the study period. Practical implications The study helps the policymakers directing their attention to the importance of digitalization on life satisfaction. Originality/value This work extends the limited understanding of subjective wellbeing, digitalization and the digital economy and society index in terms of theoretical implications.

Does less working time improve life satisfaction? Evidence from European Social Survey

“…In this study, we use European respondents' data and expect to find a positive association between safety and life satisfaction. Digitalization may reduce social costs and enhance both work efficiency among government workers and convenience in people's daily lives, thus promoting feelings of life satisfaction [45,46]. Referring to Wang et al [47], we use time spent on the internet to represent digitalization and investigate its impact on satisfaction.…”

Promoting Techno-Scientific Biomedical Communication in Russia: Pro-government Non-profit Organizations

“…Communication factors in innovations as eHealth literacy or consumers' trust, achievement of societal benefits, and subjective wellbeing were indicated as significant for Europe (Birch et al, 2014;Ricard, 2016;Griebel et al, 2017), as well as for emerging economies and developing countries (Marten et al, 2014;Hoque et al, 2017;Bosch and Vonortas, 2019). Some studies check these factors based on methods of a survey (questionnaire) or analysis of macro data of a monitoring report (Marten et al, 2014;Zbierowski, 2017;Elmassah and Hassanein, 2022). For example, Zbierowski (2017) investigated the possible impact of new technology-based firms (NTBF) on the social and economic development of eight countries of CEE and Russia and Kazakhstan as the countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS).…”

Investment in digital infrastructure: Why and for whom?

“…The internet can enable and enhance interactions locally and over large geographical distances (Elmassah, Hassanein 2022, Kearns, Whitley 2019, Oh et al 2014, Ellison et al 2007), but the benefits to individuals and firms are not aspatial. Spatial disparities exist in the benefits of online retail, with shoppers in high-income countries benefiting most and with the cost of delivery sometimes being prohibitively expensive for remote dwellers in low-income countries (Ganning, Green 2021).…”