2018
DOI: 10.13109/gege.2018.44.1.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digitale Methoden für die Historische Semantik

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But science is about conquering the unknown, there is no scientific innovation without uncertainty. Using data visualizations as part of the interpretation process produces uncertainty and provides a different kind of evidence that provokes new interpretations which can productively irritate previous knowledge (Schwandt, 2018). Allowing for the production of uncertainty opens up new spaces of interpretation.…”
Section: Producing Uncertainty In Historical Material/in History: Pro...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But science is about conquering the unknown, there is no scientific innovation without uncertainty. Using data visualizations as part of the interpretation process produces uncertainty and provides a different kind of evidence that provokes new interpretations which can productively irritate previous knowledge (Schwandt, 2018). Allowing for the production of uncertainty opens up new spaces of interpretation.…”
Section: Producing Uncertainty In Historical Material/in History: Pro...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there have been approaches to apply NLP methods in the fields of Digital Humanities and Digital History already, which demonstrate that using digital methods to deal with historical texts does not only enable us to generate new findings and process larger amounts of textual data. As highlighted by Schwandt (2018), an interdisciplinary approach combining computational methods and practices with historical research also changes the way we perceive and interpret text and allows for new research questions.…”
Section: Semantic Changes In Historical Polemical Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%