Digital Work Practices: Affordances in Design Education

Abstract

This article draws from a multi‐disciplinary, multi‐institutional research project on digital work practices and graduate work readiness. Utilising the concept of technology affordances, we focus on the potential for domain‐specific learning experiences within design education. For the purpose of this project, we have articulated digital capabilities in design by adapting affordance categories in terms of three levels of complexity for scaffolded learning: functional, perceptual and adaptive. In order to further develop the relationship between technology affordances and design education, we analyse data from an industry roundtable in relation to our developed digital capability descriptor. The findings suggest that employers need designers with highly adaptive capabilities to work in increasingly complex interdisciplinary work environments. We also found that the role of designers has changed significantly in recent years that require higher educational institutions to involve industry when developing curricula.

Building Empathy: Exploring Digital Native Characteristic to Create Learning Instruction for Learning Computer Graphic Design

“…Aside from mastering computer graphics technically, there are also skills and ability to use that capacity as tools in design practice. This substantiates previous findings referring to the importance of digital capabilities should go far beyond functional knowledge and skill in using tools [49]. These findings suggest instruction for learning computer graphic needs to apply greater attention to contextual requirements; 1) student-centered, 2) have the current technology mindset, 3) focus on the design practice, and 4) flexible, ability to be easily modified to respond to circumstances or conditions.…”

“…The basic skills of the traditional way to learning design are not enough, especially caused by the various needs of its users [48]. This finding has identified that, in establishing a professional graphic designer, design learning should place more consideration on design practice and understandings of the design process, rather than teaching specific technical tools or software that might be different or even changing future industry [49]. The finding suggested new learning objectives on learning computer graphic.…”

Destroy All Humans: The Dematerialisation of the Designer in an Age of Automation and its Impact on Graphic Design—A Literature Review

“…Crosby, Pham, Peterson and Lee (2020) make similar findings. They report on roundtable discussions with ‘design experts from private practice, media, finance and private consulting practices’ (Crosby et al.…”

Internal Quality Assurance Management as a Strategy for Achieving National Education Standards through The Principle of Continuous Improvement

“…Quality control, quality assurance, and comprehensive quality management are some of the fundamental elements of quality management (Dudin et al, 2017;Crosby et al, 2020). Applicable rules are implementing elementary and secondary education standards as part of the Quality Assurance System (QAS).…”