2020 Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icssit48917.2020.9214250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Voting: A Blockchain-based E-Voting System using Biohash and Smart Contract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Section IV presents the blockchain e-voting systems already Cabuk et al [1] Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats analysis on voting types 0 Ceinkaya et al [30] Differences between verification vs. validation in blockchain e-voting systems 0 Vivek et al [3] Requirements of a successful system 8 Jafar et al [14] Limitations and past solutions 12 Tas et al [6] Large collection of works commented 39 This survey Basic concepts of blockchain e-voting, analysis of academic proposals and commercial implementations and adoptions by different countries 64 Ethereum [31]- [39] and non-governmental organization Not mentioned [40], [41] Auditable Blockchain Voting System [42] Biometrics [43], [44] Bitcoin [45], [46] Crypto [47] Ethereum [13], [48]-[51] Systems for small scale elections:…”
Section: Traditional Voting Prosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Section IV presents the blockchain e-voting systems already Cabuk et al [1] Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats analysis on voting types 0 Ceinkaya et al [30] Differences between verification vs. validation in blockchain e-voting systems 0 Vivek et al [3] Requirements of a successful system 8 Jafar et al [14] Limitations and past solutions 12 Tas et al [6] Large collection of works commented 39 This survey Basic concepts of blockchain e-voting, analysis of academic proposals and commercial implementations and adoptions by different countries 64 Ethereum [31]- [39] and non-governmental organization Not mentioned [40], [41] Auditable Blockchain Voting System [42] Biometrics [43], [44] Bitcoin [45], [46] Crypto [47] Ethereum [13], [48]-[51] Systems for small scale elections:…”
Section: Traditional Voting Prosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Merkle Tree is a cryptographic tree in which nodes also called leaf nodes are assigned individually with the cryptographic hash of a data block [48]. Every other node that is not a leaf node is called a branch, inner node, or inode.…”
Section: Cryptographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The time stamping was based on the hierarchical hashing mechanism. Later on, in 1992, Markle Trees [ 5 ] were introduced in this blockchain design, which allowed the dependent connections between the records stored over the database. This design was patented by Stuart Haber and W. Scott Stornetta in 1992 and got lapsed in 2004.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In This [15] research, the authors combined digitalization with blockchain technology to provide a voting mechanism. Their goals were to provide integrity, anonymity, privacy, and security for voters.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%