Abstract:BackgroundDigital innovation, introduced across many industries, is a strong force of transformation. Some industries have seen faster transformation, whereas the health care sector only recently came into focus. A context where digital corporations move into health care, payers strive to keep rising costs at bay, and longer-living patients desire continuously improved quality of care points to a digital and value-based transformation with drastic implications for the health care sector.ObjectiveWe tried to op… Show more
“…A growing number of HITs have great potential for improving the quality, safety, patient-centredness and cost-effectiveness of care [3,4]. However, digitalisation is slower and more complicated in healthcare settings compared to other fields of business [5][6][7]. In addition, despite major investments [7], HIT implementation tends to fail more often in healthcare settings [6,8,9].…”
Despite major investment, health information technology (HIT) implementation often tends to fail. One of the reasons for HIT implementation failure is poor leadership in healthcare organisations, and thus, more research is needed on leaders' roles in HIT implementation. The aim of the review was to identify the role of healthcare leaders in HIT implementation. A scoping review with content analysis was conducted using a five-step framework defined by Arksey and O'Malley. Database searches were performed using CINAHL, Business Source Complete, ProQuest, Scopus and Web of Science. The included studies were written either in English or Finnish, published between 2000 and 2019, focused on HIT implementation and contained leadership insight given by various informants. In total, 16 studies were included. The roles of healthcare leaders were identified as supporter, change manager, advocate, project manager, manager, facilitator and champion. Identifying healthcare leaders' roles in HIT implementation may allow us to take a step closer to successful HIT implementation. Yet, it seems that healthcare leaders cannot fully realise these identified roles and their understanding of HIT needs enforcement. Also, healthcare leaders seem to need more support when actively participating in HIT implementation.
“…A growing number of HITs have great potential for improving the quality, safety, patient-centredness and cost-effectiveness of care [3,4]. However, digitalisation is slower and more complicated in healthcare settings compared to other fields of business [5][6][7]. In addition, despite major investments [7], HIT implementation tends to fail more often in healthcare settings [6,8,9].…”
Despite major investment, health information technology (HIT) implementation often tends to fail. One of the reasons for HIT implementation failure is poor leadership in healthcare organisations, and thus, more research is needed on leaders' roles in HIT implementation. The aim of the review was to identify the role of healthcare leaders in HIT implementation. A scoping review with content analysis was conducted using a five-step framework defined by Arksey and O'Malley. Database searches were performed using CINAHL, Business Source Complete, ProQuest, Scopus and Web of Science. The included studies were written either in English or Finnish, published between 2000 and 2019, focused on HIT implementation and contained leadership insight given by various informants. In total, 16 studies were included. The roles of healthcare leaders were identified as supporter, change manager, advocate, project manager, manager, facilitator and champion. Identifying healthcare leaders' roles in HIT implementation may allow us to take a step closer to successful HIT implementation. Yet, it seems that healthcare leaders cannot fully realise these identified roles and their understanding of HIT needs enforcement. Also, healthcare leaders seem to need more support when actively participating in HIT implementation.
“…The definition of each healthcare need is reported in Table 1. We added "surveillance" as an additional healthcare need, [5] given the importance of early identification and confinement of COVID-19 patients, and a category "other" to include any further category not considered.…”
Section: 2impact Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the COVID-19 pandemic, it was expected that digital transformation in health care would have been as disruptive as that seen in other industries. However, as stated by Hermann et al, [5] "despite new technologies being constantly introduced, this change had yet to materialize". [6] It appears that now the spread of COVID-19 has finally provided an ineludible sound reason to fully embrace the digital transformation.…”
Background.Healthcare is responding to the COVID-19 pandemic through the fast adoption of digital solutions and advanced technology tools. The aim of this study is to describe which digital solutions have been reported in the scientific literature and to investigate their potential impact in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. We conducted a literature review searching PubMed and MedrXiv with terms considered adequate to find relevant literature on the use of digital technologies in response to COVID-19. We developed an impact score to evaluate the potential impact on COVID-19 pandemic of all the digital solutions addressed in the selected papers. Results. The search identified 269 articles, of which 145 full-text articles were assessed and 124 included in the review after screening and impact evaluation. Of selected articles, most of them addressed the use of digital technologies for diagnosis, surveillance and prevention. We report that digital solutions and innovative technologies have mainly been proposed for the diagnosis of COVID-19. In particular, within the reviewed articles we identified numerous suggestions on the use of artificial-intelligence-powered tools for the diagnosis and screening of COVID-19. Digital technologies are useful also for prevention and surveillance measures, for example through contact-tracing apps or monitoring of internet searches and social media usage. Discussion. It is worth taking advantage of the push given by the crisis, and mandatory to keep track of the digital solutions proposed today to implement tomorrow's best practices and models of care, and to be ready for any new moments of emergency.
“…Inspired by the fourth paradigm-data-intensive scientific discovery (Hey, Tansley, Tolle, 2009), Healthcare 4.0 is a collective term for datadriven digital health technologies such as smart health, mHealth (mobile health), wireless health, eHealth, online health, medical IT, telehealth/telemedicine, digital medicine, health informatics, pervasive health, and health information system. It describes the digital frontiers and disruptive innovation in the health care sector that is driving new business models and value networks (Herrmann et al, 2018). Advancements and adoptions of Healthcare 4.0 are occurring across many developed countries in the world with the digital health market expected to grow to $223.7 billion by 2023 (Prescient, & Strategic Intelligence, Sept, 2018).…”
Healthcare 4.0 is a term that has emerged recently and derived from Industry 4.0. Today, the health care sector is more digital than in past decades; for example, spreading from x‐rays and magnetic resonance imaging to computed tomography and ultrasound scans to electric medical records. With the wide spectrum of digital technologies underpinning Healthcare 4.0 to deliver more effective and efficient health care services, in this article, we use the wisdom pyramid methodology to conduct a systematic review of current digital frontiers in Healthcare 4.0.
This article is categorized under:
Technologies > Computer Architectures for Data Mining
Application Areas > Health Care
Application Areas > Data Mining Software Tools
Fundamental Concepts of Data and Knowledge > Knowledge Representation
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.