“…• One supposes µ and ω must be non-negative, but this is not stated. The assertion presented as Theorem 3.3 of [7] is shown in Figure 15. In the statement of this assertion:…”
Section: Assertions For Weakly Compatible Maps Inmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…7. Assertion for expansive map in [7] The paper [7] claims to have a fixed point theorem for digital metric spaces. However, it is not clear what the authors intend to assert, as the paper has many undefined and unreferenced terms and many obscuring typographical errors.…”
Section: Assertions For Weakly Compatible Maps Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assertion stated as "Preposition" 2.7 of [7] (and also as an unlabeled Proposition on p. 10769 of [11]) was shown in Example 4.1 of [6] to be false.…”
Section: Assertions For Weakly Compatible Maps Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have shown that nearly every assertion introduced in the papers [11,1,12,14,7] is incorrect, unproven due to errors in the "proofs," or trivial. These papers are part of a larger body of highly flawed publications devoted to fixed point assertions in digital metric spaces, and emphasize our contention that the digital metric space is not a worthy subject of study.…”
As in [6, 3, 4, 5], we discuss published assertions concerning fixed points in “digital metric spaces” - assertions that are incorrect or incorrectly proven, or reduce to triviality.
“…• One supposes µ and ω must be non-negative, but this is not stated. The assertion presented as Theorem 3.3 of [7] is shown in Figure 15. In the statement of this assertion:…”
Section: Assertions For Weakly Compatible Maps Inmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…7. Assertion for expansive map in [7] The paper [7] claims to have a fixed point theorem for digital metric spaces. However, it is not clear what the authors intend to assert, as the paper has many undefined and unreferenced terms and many obscuring typographical errors.…”
Section: Assertions For Weakly Compatible Maps Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assertion stated as "Preposition" 2.7 of [7] (and also as an unlabeled Proposition on p. 10769 of [11]) was shown in Example 4.1 of [6] to be false.…”
Section: Assertions For Weakly Compatible Maps Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have shown that nearly every assertion introduced in the papers [11,1,12,14,7] is incorrect, unproven due to errors in the "proofs," or trivial. These papers are part of a larger body of highly flawed publications devoted to fixed point assertions in digital metric spaces, and emphasize our contention that the digital metric space is not a worthy subject of study.…”
As in [6, 3, 4, 5], we discuss published assertions concerning fixed points in “digital metric spaces” - assertions that are incorrect or incorrectly proven, or reduce to triviality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.