2019
DOI: 10.1080/03601277.2019.1687149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital tools for delivery of dementia education for health-care providers: a systematic review

Abstract: Continuing education on dementia for healthcare providers has been shown to have positive effects on diagnostic confidence, knowledge, and care management. Technological approaches to educational delivery have been found to have comparable effects in terms of quality and efficacy. The purpose of the systematic review was to compose and present an evidence base for technology-delivered dementia education for healthcare providers. The review used PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane methods focusing on studies with a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(186 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality appraisal was also completed by one reviewer; however, it is worth noting that MERSQI focuses on design issues and is quite objective [ 50 ]. It is also worth noting that the overall quality of studies was judged to be ‘moderate’—which is consistent with other reviews of TEDE [ 28 ]. Second reviewers appraised a proportion of studies using MMAT which mitigated against bias where more subjective judgments were involved; however, the application of MMAT to this review context required additional justification as it is traditionally used in systematic mixed studies reviews.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Quality appraisal was also completed by one reviewer; however, it is worth noting that MERSQI focuses on design issues and is quite objective [ 50 ]. It is also worth noting that the overall quality of studies was judged to be ‘moderate’—which is consistent with other reviews of TEDE [ 28 ]. Second reviewers appraised a proportion of studies using MMAT which mitigated against bias where more subjective judgments were involved; however, the application of MMAT to this review context required additional justification as it is traditionally used in systematic mixed studies reviews.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Despite debate as to whether evidence hierarchies are appropriate frameworks to judge the quality of educational research [ 79 ], benefits of randomised trials and controlled studies have been described in similar reviews of TEDE [ 28 ]. Reviewers of traditional dementia education endorse randomised trials when considering intervention effectiveness [ 11 ]; others highlight challenges associated with randomised trials in healthcare settings [ 80 ]; or suggest integrating qualitative methods to deal with complex educational interventions [ 81 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using online technologies to provide services to rural carers may help overcome lack of services and improve access to services in a large geographical area. A systematic review and meta-analysis of remotely delivered education for carers of people living with dementia demonstrated positive impacts for carer wellbeing [11]. O'Connell et al (2021) described how telephone-based training could help older adults and carers use internetbased methods for videoconferencing to maintain social and community connections during the global pandemic [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%