2020
DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30137-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital tools against COVID-19: taxonomy, ethical challenges, and navigation aid

Abstract: Data collection and processing via digital public health technologies are being promoted worldwide by governments and private companies as strategic remedies for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic and loosening lockdown measures. However, the ethical and legal boundaries of deploying digital tools for disease surveillance and control purposes are unclear, and a rapidly evolving debate has emerged globally around the promises and risks of mobilising digital tools for public health. To help scientists and policy m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
310
1
15

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
310
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…CT apps may prove to be valuable public health tools, but they also raise significant concerns (Gasser et al 2020;Lucivero et al 2020). As part of the Covid-19 pandemic response, advisory bodies, NGOs, and expert initiatives have interrogated the ethical aspects of digital surveillance technologies, including CT apps (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CT apps may prove to be valuable public health tools, but they also raise significant concerns (Gasser et al 2020;Lucivero et al 2020). As part of the Covid-19 pandemic response, advisory bodies, NGOs, and expert initiatives have interrogated the ethical aspects of digital surveillance technologies, including CT apps (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first ethical frameworks for digital tools in the context of Covid-19 have been proposed (Mello and Wang 2020;Gasser et al 2020;Lucivero et al 2020;Kahn et al 2020;Morley et al 2020;Parker et al 2020), and the European Commission (2020) has drafted various recommendations and guidelines for digital contact tracing in the EU.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the use of contact-tracing or exposure notification technologies raise a host of other issues which have been far less prevalent in discussions around their deployment. These involve questions of ethics and human rights that include access to the technologies, the deployment of unproven technologies on vulnerable populations, the risks of false positives and negative notifications and the potential for differential impacts on vulnerable communities, and the raising of false expectations that might lead to more risk-taking behaviours (Millar 2020, Kahn 2020Kitchin 2020, Gasser et al 2020. The focus on privacy, and in particular, the debate over centralized and decentralized storage, also framed the discussion as one about which type of contact-tracing app to adopt, rather than one of whether contact-tracing apps were ethically appropriate or even useful technologies.…”
Section: Global Debates About Privacy/surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copyright holder for this this version posted October 26, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.22.20216788 doi: medRxiv preprint 2 individuals. [8] This automated and digital approach thus offers governments a more costeffective and easily scalable method than traditional contact tracing. [9] Given such advantages, several countries have or are in the process of developing Covid-19 digital contact tracing mobile applications.…”
Section: Digital Contact Tracingmentioning
confidence: 99%