2020
DOI: 10.25029/od.2020.260.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital technologies, big data and ideological (neoliberal) fantasies

Abstract: Many fantasies hold that digitalisation can construct democratic spaces for discussing experiences about educational matters. However, based on thinkers such as Rancière, Žižek and Agamben, it is argued that increased big data production in education through digitalisation does not support such democratic spaces. Instead, it mirrors a neoliberal fantasy and a form of instrumentarian power that distributes the sensible in mechanical (numerical) ways. Democracy in education is at risk of being dismantled by perc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Public exposure and transparency (Han, 2015) by means of evaluations and ratings are often valued not only by politicians but also by the public for their potential to visibilize the quality of education, its value, its contemporary condition, and its success/lack of fulfillment. However, such exposure and transparency can, paradoxically, despite their assumed democratic potential as a starting point for complicated conversations about educational quality (Rüsselbæk Hansen, 2020), encourage leaders and educators to improve their image by striving for positive reviews that can be brought into the open without consequences or risks (Mau, 2019). These could include evaluations and ratings that mirror market alignment, harmony, wellbeing, and (student) satisfaction (Furedi, 2011; Hudson, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Public exposure and transparency (Han, 2015) by means of evaluations and ratings are often valued not only by politicians but also by the public for their potential to visibilize the quality of education, its value, its contemporary condition, and its success/lack of fulfillment. However, such exposure and transparency can, paradoxically, despite their assumed democratic potential as a starting point for complicated conversations about educational quality (Rüsselbæk Hansen, 2020), encourage leaders and educators to improve their image by striving for positive reviews that can be brought into the open without consequences or risks (Mau, 2019). These could include evaluations and ratings that mirror market alignment, harmony, wellbeing, and (student) satisfaction (Furedi, 2011; Hudson, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that much time and resources are spent by educational institutions to strengthen their educational brand (Huzzard et al, 2017), their capital value in the eyes of others (Rüsselbaek Hansen, 2020), by developing powerful, salable, and attractive narratives (Schostak, 2020). For example, narratives that promise they are special places in which quality education take place and in which dreams can come true.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation