Digital Sociologies
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1t89cfr.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital sociology’s vocational promise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the concept emphasizes the qualitative changes to communicative action brought about by hyper-mediation (Hjarvard, 2013). In mediatized fields, social action is not only bound by traditional institutional relations but is also constantly augmented by media(ted) dynamics, which can amount to a fundamental shift in the form and function of fields (Barnard, 2016c; Couldry, 2014; Jurgenson, 2012). The proliferation of #BlackLivesMatter—both as a hashtag and a networked social movement—illustrates how a hybrid, mediatized political–journalistic field can operate.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the concept emphasizes the qualitative changes to communicative action brought about by hyper-mediation (Hjarvard, 2013). In mediatized fields, social action is not only bound by traditional institutional relations but is also constantly augmented by media(ted) dynamics, which can amount to a fundamental shift in the form and function of fields (Barnard, 2016c; Couldry, 2014; Jurgenson, 2012). The proliferation of #BlackLivesMatter—both as a hashtag and a networked social movement—illustrates how a hybrid, mediatized political–journalistic field can operate.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapidly changing technological landscapes have blurred the boundaries between public and private spheres and altered the contours of risk in relation to self identity (Bond, 2014). Yet as Stokes (2010: 321) observes:… conceiving of the ‘web’ as a dimension of reality rather than a separate space frees us from the traditional false dichotomies found in social science and the false analogy of ‘virtual’ and ‘real’.As such: ‘given the ubiquity of digital technology and connectivity in contemporary society, an honest, empirically driven, and sociologically grounded discussion of these dynamics is long overdue’ (Barnard, 2017: 199).…”
Section: Risk Versus Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is even less research on how the family informs the Internet. Although there is a lot of "digital scholarship" (i.e., studies with native digital data, digital methods, and online publication outlets), there is a lack of "scholarship of the digital" that places digital technologies at the heart of theoretical and empirical inquiry (Barnard, 2017). A tacit yet enduring dichotomy between online and offline social life remains (see Maddox, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%