This paper is an exploration into whether public space users performing different activities describe their auditory environments in noticeably different ways. Building on soundscape and psycholinguistic literature, aq uestionnaire study wasconducted in alarge park in Amsterdam (NL),where 92 park users described, in writing, their activities and auditory environments. Users' self-reported activities were categorized based on their levelofsocial interaction (solitary vs. socially interactive), and using open coding, generating categories of activities grouped by semantic range. The written corpus on auditory environment descriptions wasa nalysed through ap roposed classificatory framework, coding descriptions at three semantic and one syntactic level. We preliminarily tested whether there are associations between various categories of activities and of auditory environment descriptions, categorized at different levels. Our results suggest that, while for detailed levels of activity categorization there were no non-distinct patterns, the levelo fs ocial interaction of users' activities has an observable effect over users' descriptions of their auditory environments. This holds particularly in relation to types of sounds listed, as well as for differences in descriptions at asyntactic level. These findings point towards subtly different auditory experiences in the same public space for users performing solitary or socially interactive activities.