1965
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.1965.1062985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital recording properties of evaporated cobalt films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation of the coercivity with thickness shows a marked increase in coercivity in the range 750-1000 A, with a gradual decrease in coercivity for thicker films. Middleton and Walker (1966) and Davies et al (1965) have reported the thickness dependence of the coercivity of evaporated cobalt films deposited on glass and melinex substrates respectively. Their results are similar to those obtained here, the coercivity showing a marked increase in the range 750-1000 A and a gradual decrease for thicker films.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variation of the coercivity with thickness shows a marked increase in coercivity in the range 750-1000 A, with a gradual decrease in coercivity for thicker films. Middleton and Walker (1966) and Davies et al (1965) have reported the thickness dependence of the coercivity of evaporated cobalt films deposited on glass and melinex substrates respectively. Their results are similar to those obtained here, the coercivity showing a marked increase in the range 750-1000 A and a gradual decrease for thicker films.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transverse susceptibilities were measured with a conventional induction loop plotter where the unintegrated signal from a pick-up coil is displayed as a function of longitudinal d.c. field on an XY recorder (Feldtkeller 1963). In all cases the hysteretic measurements were made simultaneously on both surfaces of each film and, in describing the results, 'front surface' is used to mean the free surface of the film and 'back surface' to mean the surface in contact with the substrate.…”
Section: Experimental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%