Abstract:Digital radiography (DR) technologies have the advantage of a wide dynamic range compared to their film-screen predecessors, however, this poses a potential for increased patient exposure if left unchecked. Manufacturers have developed the exposure index (EI) to counter this, which provides radiographers with feedback on the exposure reaching the detector. As these EIs were manufacturer-specific, a wide variety of EIs existed. To offset this, the international standardised EI has been developed by the Internat… Show more
“…However, as illustrated in the graph, the EI values spread over a range of values rather than being close to some specific target value. A number of factors contribute to this variation in EI value, including variable collimation 35 and segmentation by the EI algorithm. There is also the known dependence of EI with patient thickness: 36 patients with different thickness and anatomy will produce a change in the beam quality, which then influences the EI value.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Lungman Phantom To Patients Using Ei Kapmentioning
This work concerns the validation of the Kyoto-Kagaku thorax anthropomorphic phantom Lungman for use in chest radiography optimization. The equivalence in terms of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) was established for the lung and mediastinum regions of the phantom. Patient chest examination data acquired under automatic exposure control were collated over a 2-year period for a standard x-ray room. Parameters surveyed included exposure index, air kerma area product, and exposure time, which were compared with Lungman values. Finally, a voxel model was developed by segmenting computed tomography images of the phantom and implemented in PENELOPE/penEasy Monte Carlo code to compare phantom tissue-equivalent materials with materials from ICRP Publication 89 in terms of organ dose. PMMA equivalence varied depending on tube voltage, from 9.5 to 10.0 cm and from 13.5 to 13.7 cm, for the lungs and mediastinum regions, respectively. For the survey, close agreement was found between the phantom and the patients' median values (deviations lay between 8% and 14%). Differences in lung doses, an important organ for optimization in chest radiography, were below 13% when comparing the use of phantom tissue-equivalent materials versus ICRP materials. The study confirms the value of the Lungman for chest optimization studies.
“…However, as illustrated in the graph, the EI values spread over a range of values rather than being close to some specific target value. A number of factors contribute to this variation in EI value, including variable collimation 35 and segmentation by the EI algorithm. There is also the known dependence of EI with patient thickness: 36 patients with different thickness and anatomy will produce a change in the beam quality, which then influences the EI value.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Lungman Phantom To Patients Using Ei Kapmentioning
This work concerns the validation of the Kyoto-Kagaku thorax anthropomorphic phantom Lungman for use in chest radiography optimization. The equivalence in terms of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) was established for the lung and mediastinum regions of the phantom. Patient chest examination data acquired under automatic exposure control were collated over a 2-year period for a standard x-ray room. Parameters surveyed included exposure index, air kerma area product, and exposure time, which were compared with Lungman values. Finally, a voxel model was developed by segmenting computed tomography images of the phantom and implemented in PENELOPE/penEasy Monte Carlo code to compare phantom tissue-equivalent materials with materials from ICRP Publication 89 in terms of organ dose. PMMA equivalence varied depending on tube voltage, from 9.5 to 10.0 cm and from 13.5 to 13.7 cm, for the lungs and mediastinum regions, respectively. For the survey, close agreement was found between the phantom and the patients' median values (deviations lay between 8% and 14%). Differences in lung doses, an important organ for optimization in chest radiography, were below 13% when comparing the use of phantom tissue-equivalent materials versus ICRP materials. The study confirms the value of the Lungman for chest optimization studies.
“…In Press(In Press):e107258. the system during post-processing procedure in computer and digital imaging (18,21). As the head of the humerus or the mandible are depicted as extremely white, it can reduce the contrast of other areas of the image during rendering.…”
Background: A chest X-ray (CXR) is known as the most common radiography used for adult and pediatric patients worldwide. Improper X-ray field collimation can result in excessive radiation dose on non-thoracic organs in chest radiographs. Objectives: This study was to investigate X-ray field collimation quality in neonatal chest radiography. Methods: A total of 213 chest radiographs of neonates from three hospitals were analyzed for collimation quality assessment in a retrospective study. Accordingly, ideal imaging field (IIF) and current imaging field (CIF) were initially defined. The margins of the IIF included acromioclavicular (AC) level to lower costal margin (i.e. top to bottom) and one centimeter beyond the broadest area of the chest on each side (that is, right to left). The CIF size was also defined as the square borders of collimators. Results: The findings revealed that the area of the CIF was 1.65 ± 0.39 times to the ideal imaging firlddd (IIF) for three hospitals, suggesting that collimation quality in neonatal chest radiographs was not accurate and it had defects. According to the results, acceptable collimation percentage (36.6%) in Hospital A was more than that in two other centers, and the given center also provided the lowest radiation due to the exposure of non-thoracic structures to primary beams. Conclusions: It was concluded that training radiographers and using patient immobilization devices and stabilizers were of important points that could reduce radiation exposure to non-thoracic organs in pediatric CXR.
“…Son muy útiles las dosis de referencia publicadas. Familiarizarse con los factores de exposición para evitar la sobreexposición; los fabricantes deben implementar los nuevos parámetros de exposición de la IEC 16 Es de gran utilidad conocer estos parámetros en cada prueba, que deberían grabarse en el almacenamiento de imágenes DICOM para poder visualizarlas. Los fabricantes se comprometieron, en el Image Gently Digital Radiography Summit de 2010, y ha sido publicado, a adoptar los parámetros IEC 17 muchos estudios pediátricos puede limitarse la cobertura exclusivamente al área anatómica de interés, intentando evitar el solapamiento y reduciendo así la dosis de radiación.…”
Section: Radioprotección En Tomografía Computarizadaunclassified
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.