The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital radiography exposure indices: A review

Abstract: Digital radiography (DR) technologies have the advantage of a wide dynamic range compared to their film-screen predecessors, however, this poses a potential for increased patient exposure if left unchecked. Manufacturers have developed the exposure index (EI) to counter this, which provides radiographers with feedback on the exposure reaching the detector. As these EIs were manufacturer-specific, a wide variety of EIs existed. To offset this, the international standardised EI has been developed by the Internat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
23
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as illustrated in the graph, the EI values spread over a range of values rather than being close to some specific target value. A number of factors contribute to this variation in EI value, including variable collimation 35 and segmentation by the EI algorithm. There is also the known dependence of EI with patient thickness: 36 patients with different thickness and anatomy will produce a change in the beam quality, which then influences the EI value.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Lungman Phantom To Patients Using Ei Kapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as illustrated in the graph, the EI values spread over a range of values rather than being close to some specific target value. A number of factors contribute to this variation in EI value, including variable collimation 35 and segmentation by the EI algorithm. There is also the known dependence of EI with patient thickness: 36 patients with different thickness and anatomy will produce a change in the beam quality, which then influences the EI value.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Lungman Phantom To Patients Using Ei Kapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Press(In Press):e107258. the system during post-processing procedure in computer and digital imaging (18,21). As the head of the humerus or the mandible are depicted as extremely white, it can reduce the contrast of other areas of the image during rendering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Son muy útiles las dosis de referencia publicadas. Familiarizarse con los factores de exposición para evitar la sobreexposición; los fabricantes deben implementar los nuevos parámetros de exposición de la IEC 16 Es de gran utilidad conocer estos parámetros en cada prueba, que deberían grabarse en el almacenamiento de imágenes DICOM para poder visualizarlas. Los fabricantes se comprometieron, en el Image Gently Digital Radiography Summit de 2010, y ha sido publicado, a adoptar los parámetros IEC 17 muchos estudios pediátricos puede limitarse la cobertura exclusivamente al área anatómica de interés, intentando evitar el solapamiento y reduciendo así la dosis de radiación.…”
Section: Radioprotección En Tomografía Computarizadaunclassified