1991
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(91)90995-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital radiography — a review of detector design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The developed detector may have several important advantages over the other X-ray imaging devices. For example, in contrast to the 2D medical imaging detectors (see for example [1], [10]) it operates in photon counting mode, much less sensitive to the scattered x-ray photons (due to the strong X-ray collimation) and certainly should be much cheaper. We also expect that our hybrid detector will be cheaper than the scanning systems based on linear matrix of the scintillators [2] or solid-state detectors [1].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The developed detector may have several important advantages over the other X-ray imaging devices. For example, in contrast to the 2D medical imaging detectors (see for example [1], [10]) it operates in photon counting mode, much less sensitive to the scattered x-ray photons (due to the strong X-ray collimation) and certainly should be much cheaper. We also expect that our hybrid detector will be cheaper than the scanning systems based on linear matrix of the scintillators [2] or solid-state detectors [1].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason most of the existing detectors filled with gases at pressures of 10 atm and more operate in ionization chamber modes only. But even at these pressures the position resolution is limited (typically by 200-300 m) due to the electron diffusion, X-ray fluorescent photons and several other effects (see for example [10] and references therein).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiation absorption due to fundamental processes of radiation scattering depend on the detector design and the choice of radiation sources. The conventional design with X-ray tubes usually used metal filters (Harrison, 1991). We use the ZnSe detector instead of a metal filter.…”
Section: Physical Principles Of Dual-energy Ctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signals are detected in synchronization with application of different voltages onto the X-ray tube. Harrison (1991) presented a dual-energy tomography results obtained with energy separation ensured by a certain energy selectivity of the detectors. The method consisted in the use of the low-energy detector (LED) of gadolinium oxysulphide placed before the emitter, and the high-energy detector (HED) of CsI(Tl)-behind it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Methods of energy separation depend upon the detector design and the choice of radiation sources. In a classical design with X-ray tubes, metal filters are used [4]. In new developments, the role of a filter may be played by a lowenergy detector array (e.g., based on zinc selenide).…”
Section: Physical Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%