2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00103-020-03148-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Public Health – Hebel für Capacity Building in der kommunalen Gesundheitsförderung

Abstract: ZusammenfassungMit der Ottawa-Charta von 1986 wurde ein Paradigmenwechsel vollzogen, der alle Public-Health-Anstrengungen auf die Stärkung kommunaler Aktivitäten und die Schaffung gesundheitsförderlicher Lebensumstände orientiert. Ein Schlüssel hierfür ist „capacity building“ (CB), verstanden als die Entwicklung und möglichst nachhaltige Implementierung von strukturellen Kapazitäten – wie koordinierte Datenerhebung, Abstimmungsprozesse über Sektorengrenzen hinweg, dauerhafte Bereitstellung grundständiger Resso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most interventions were health care applications (ie, 100/179, 55.9% for primary, 89/179, 49.7% for secondary, and 55/179, 30.7% for tertiary health care). Out of the 179 interventions, while 16 (8.9%) interventions included a research component [ 57 , 84 , 93 , 104 , 128 , 139 , 154 , 163 , 180 , 220 , 221 , 225 ], only 3 (1.7%) focused exclusively on research: the Lone Star Stroke Consortium Telestroke Registry, the SAI Databank for electronic health research and evaluation, and the German COVID-19 data donation app (ie, Corona Datenspende) [ 57 , 93 , 128 ]. For prevention, of the 179 interventions, 13 (7%) exclusively targeted primary prevention (ie, through vaccination registries, behavior change programs, or health education in healthy individuals) [ 55 , 62 , 96 , 98 , 101 , 106 , 126 , 140 , 143 , 188 , 208 , 223 , 226 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most interventions were health care applications (ie, 100/179, 55.9% for primary, 89/179, 49.7% for secondary, and 55/179, 30.7% for tertiary health care). Out of the 179 interventions, while 16 (8.9%) interventions included a research component [ 57 , 84 , 93 , 104 , 128 , 139 , 154 , 163 , 180 , 220 , 221 , 225 ], only 3 (1.7%) focused exclusively on research: the Lone Star Stroke Consortium Telestroke Registry, the SAI Databank for electronic health research and evaluation, and the German COVID-19 data donation app (ie, Corona Datenspende) [ 57 , 93 , 128 ]. For prevention, of the 179 interventions, 13 (7%) exclusively targeted primary prevention (ie, through vaccination registries, behavior change programs, or health education in healthy individuals) [ 55 , 62 , 96 , 98 , 101 , 106 , 126 , 140 , 143 , 188 , 208 , 223 , 226 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported the health management model, including Community health management models in the United States (Chronic Care Model, CCM) framework, Finland (Vartiainen, 2018 ), the United Kingdom, Germany, and Japan. The models described earlier clarify the management targets, subjects, processes, specific practices, and safeguards, but lack digitally driven CDM and do not maximize the benefits of digital technology (Zens et al, 2020 ). Digital technology is a key enabler for integrated models of community-based primary health care, but little is known about how existing technologies can be utilized to support the delivery of integrated care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%