In this issue of The Journal of Clinical Hypertension, Kandavar and colleagues 1 studied the circulatory changes in prehypertensive patients by digital plethysmography for measurement of blood flow and reactive hyperemic index (RHI). Additionally, they measured augmentation index (AI) and the effect of nebivolol therapy on L-arginine, asymmetric dimethlyarginine (ADMA), symmetric dimethlyarginine (SDMA), and L-citrulline levels after 8 weeks in a blinded fashion. Consequently, they demonstrated that 8 weeks of nebivolol therapy has no significant effect on RHI, ADMA, SDMA, or AI, whereas digital blood flow and L-citrulline levels were significantly increased after nebivolol therapy. They concluded that prehypertension is associated with increased ADMA and evidence of increased arterial stiffness and preserved RHI. Nebivolol therapy is associated with digital vasodilatation and increased nitric oxide production, as depicted by increased levels of L-citrulline and mean digital blood flow. Nebivolol, a third-generation b 1 -selective b-blocker, has shown favorable effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, as well as on endothelial function and oxidative stress. Nebivolol was shown to improve arterial stiffness to a greater extent than older b-blockers, increase the bioavailability of nitric oxide, decrease oxidative stress, and also have an antiproliferative effect.2-4 Thus, the current article is in accordance with previous findings in general. It is well written and has good methodology. However, some issues have to be mentioned.First, the sample size is relatively small to reach firm conclusions. Apart from that in the nebivolol group, both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) also decreased in the placebo group during follow-up, suggesting that some patients may have experienced the white-coat effect. Although the authors acknowledge this and admit that they did not perform ambulatory BP monitoring, this may be the major drawback given the fact that the baseline patient number was relatively low.Second, the authors state that ADMA levels are higher when compared with those in healthy individuals but there is no mention in the manuscript regarding the levels of ADMA in this population. In addition, there was no change in ADMA before and after treatment. These findings are not novel. Indeed, the same group previously demonstrated that nebivolol treatment was associated with stable ADMA levels, while treatment with metoprolol was associated with increased ADMA levels, which is an important finding to differentiate third-generation b-blockers from older ones.
5Recent evidence has shown that central BP is more relevant for predicting cardiovascular (CV) outcomes than peripheral pressure in the brachial artery. [6][7][8] Indeed, it was suggested that brachial BP does not reflect the pressure in the central circulation.9 In addition, different classes of antihypertensive drugs have different effects on the central BP and arterial stiffness.10 However, the current study did not show any beneficial effect of n...