2017
DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital pathology in the diagnostic setting: beyond technology into best practice and service management

Abstract: Digital pathology (DP) and whole-slide imaging (WSI) technology have matured substantially over the last few years and there is growing evidence from validation studies that WSI is comparable to glass slides for histopathology diagnosis, although with some limitations, which can be appropriately minimised. Whether the controlled environment of validation studies translates to the same level of robustness when WSI is used in the actual diagnostic setting depends on the technical quality of WSI acquisition and o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After SEM observation, re-staining with H&E enables us to store the slide. If exact original H&E images are needed, use of the digital pathology system (also called whole slide imaging system) [20], before SEM-EDS analysis, would be helpful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After SEM observation, re-staining with H&E enables us to store the slide. If exact original H&E images are needed, use of the digital pathology system (also called whole slide imaging system) [20], before SEM-EDS analysis, would be helpful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most significant short-term benefit is the adoption of WSI for primary diagnosis by laboratories in the United States. Those institutions that transition to using WSI for primary diagnosis will likely soon join laboratories in Canada, 9,10 Europe, 11,12 and Singapore 13,14 that have been doing this for several years. The early experience from these laboratories indicates that, with proper preparation and planning, at least 95% of cases can be reported digitally without the need to defer to glass slides.…”
Section: Exactly What Did the Fda Approve And What Are The Implications?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corollary is that review of glass slides with a light microscope will still be required in a small number of cases, as per the April 2017 FDA approval announcement. Cheng et al 14 in Singapore implemented WSI with a primary focus on the reporting of small biopsies. In addition to workflow benefits and minimizing (if not eliminating) the chance of valuable biopsy slides becoming lost or damaged, this laboratory found the implementation of WSI was associated with a need for continual service management.…”
Section: Exactly What Did the Fda Approve And What Are The Implications?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulatory issues and the high costs associated with scanning slides and storing the digital images still impede large scale introduction of ‘digital pathology’. At the same time, most pathologists now recognise the advantages of a fully digitised workflow: increased efficiency and ergonomics, better patient safety and higher quality of diagnostics …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, most pathologists now recognise the advantages of a fully digitised workflow: increased efficiency and ergonomics, better patient safety and higher quality of diagnostics. [1][2][3] Remote digital revision and consultation is an important use of digital pathology and is used increasingly in the United States and a few other countries, but has not been studied widely. [4][5][6] In cases where a patient is referred from one hospital to another for further treatment, the pathology material (glass slides and possibly tissue blocks) is usually shipped by regular mail to the other hospital.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%