Digital pathology and image analysis augment biospecimen annotation and biobank quality assurance harmonization

Abstract

Standardization of biorepository best practices will enhance the quality of translational biomedical research utilizing patient-derived biobank specimens. Harmonization of pathology quality assurance procedures for biobank accessions has lagged behind other avenues of biospecimen research and biobank development. Comprehension of the cellular content of biorepository specimens is important for discovery of tissue-specific clinically relevant biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment. While rapidly emerging technologies in molecular analyses and data mining create focus on appropriate measures for minimizing pre-analytic artifact-inducing variables, less attention gets paid to annotating the constituent make up of biospecimens for more effective specimen selection by biobank clients. Both pre-analytic tissue processing and a specimen's composition influence acquisition of relevant macromolecules for downstream assays. Pathologist review of biorepository submissions, particularly tissues as part of quality assurance procedures, helps to ensure that the intended target cells are present and in sufficient quantity in accessioned specimens. This manual procedure can be tedious and subjective. Incorporating digital pathology into biobank quality assurance procedures, using automated pattern recognition morphometric image analysis to quantify tissue feature areas in digital whole slide images of tissue sections, can minimize variability and subjectivity associated with routine pathologic evaluations in biorepositories. Whole-slide images and pathologist-reviewed morphometric analyses can be provided to researchers to guide specimen selection. Harmonization of pathology quality assurance methods that minimize subjectivity and improve reproducibility among collections would facilitate research-relevant specimen selection by investigators and could facilitate information sharing in an integrated network approach to biobanking.

Why brain banking should be regarded as a special type of biobanking: ethical, practical, and data-management challenges

“…The former involves scanning slides of the available brain regions with high-resolution microscopes. 73 The images can then be provided upon request. The procedure greatly increases the work of each autopsy, but it can help neuropathologists make their requests for tissues appropriately specific, and it allows a direct comparison of immunohistochemical stainings from the providing and the receiving facilities.…”

Spatial Statistics for Segmenting Histological Structures in H&E Stained Tissue Images

“…Accurate segmentation of histological structures can thus help build a spatial interaction map to serve as an exploratory tool for pathologists [1]. Segmentation can also facilitate precision medicine studies which perform microdissection for deep molecular profiling [2]. …”

EPMA position paper in cancer: current overview and future perspectives

“…Two core aspects of the biobanking discipline are quality and good governance of biospecimen [ 354 ]. The reliable biobank and standardized procedure of collection and storage of biospecimen are the basis that guarantees one to realize large-scale molecular research in cancer [ 355 - 360 ]. For each pituitary tumor, its tumor tissue, CSF, blood, and all clinical information are required for eventual studies.…”