1991
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8655(91)90412-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital or analog Hough transform?

Abstract: A variation of the Hough Transform that is aimed at detecting digital lines has been recently suggested. Other Hough algorithms are intended to detect straight lines in the analog pre-image. These approaches arc analyzed and compared in terms of the relation between the achievable resolution and the required number of accumulators, using a definition of resolution that is based on the Geometric Probability measure of straight lines. It is shown that the "analog" approach is greatly superior in high resolution … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More precisely, we use the mathematical measure of lines in the plane to evaluate a kind of accuracy of the DSS recognition. Similar analyses have been proposed in (Kiryati et al, 1991) to compare the continuous and the analytical Hough transforms. The authors have considered the measure of the DSS worst case in both models for recognition purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…More precisely, we use the mathematical measure of lines in the plane to evaluate a kind of accuracy of the DSS recognition. Similar analyses have been proposed in (Kiryati et al, 1991) to compare the continuous and the analytical Hough transforms. The authors have considered the measure of the DSS worst case in both models for recognition purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…More than 2500 papers focus on its improved algorithms and applications [19]. Some improved algorithms have been developed based on classical Hough Transform, such as Generalized Hough Transform [20], Progressive Probabilistic Hough Transform [21], Random Hough Transform [22], Digital Hough Transform [23], and Fuzzy Hough Transform [24].…”
Section: Traditional Methods For Components Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the PHT algorithm, one object point maps into many parameter values ( ρ , θ ) (one-to-many mapping), while RHT uses many object points to define a straight line (many-to-one mapping) [15,16]. Although these proposed alternative algorithms could reduce resource consumption and processing time, they do not consider the location errors (errors between the actual line coordinates and digital image coordinates) [17], so that the accuracy is compromised. In order to solve this problem, DHT adopts a pattern of judging whether a given set of object points has the digital straight-line (DSL) property [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%