2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2014.10.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital neutron/gamma discrimination with an organic scintillator at energies between 1 MeV and 100 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an ideal detector, statistical fluctuations in pulse shape lead to Gaussian distributions of for gamma-ray and neutron events with equal values of . It has been shown that the digital charge comparison method provides near-optimal separation at high energies, providing the short integration time, , is carefully optimised for a chosen light output range [17]. Differences in the pulse shape of the light output lead to optimal integration times at MeV of 30 ns and 50 ns for EJ301 and EJ299-33 respectively.…”
Section: Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an ideal detector, statistical fluctuations in pulse shape lead to Gaussian distributions of for gamma-ray and neutron events with equal values of . It has been shown that the digital charge comparison method provides near-optimal separation at high energies, providing the short integration time, , is carefully optimised for a chosen light output range [17]. Differences in the pulse shape of the light output lead to optimal integration times at MeV of 30 ns and 50 ns for EJ301 and EJ299-33 respectively.…”
Section: Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second parameter QS was calculated by integrating the pulse over a shorter time interval (tS), optimized to be 30 ns. 17 A pulse shape parameter S was then defined as (3) which is the basis of a charge comparison method of pulse shape discrimination. 18 Constants k and C were chosen in order to appropriately scale and offset S. Figure 2 shows distributions of events as a function of parameters L and S for two typical runs with Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread use of digitizers, supported by cheap commodity storage, have made it common practice to keep detailed records of every critical signal in an experiment with nanosecond precision. With this capability, PSD analysis no longer requires dedicated hardware, e.g., using fixed width integration windows [2]. More detailed signal analyses using fits becomes possible.…”
Section: Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decay tail may consist of multiple exponential components depending on the formulation of the liquid and particle being detected. For example, NE213 and the equivalent formulations of EJ301 and BC501A, are designed for fast neutron counting with good pulse-shape discrimination [1] (PSD) capability for distinguishing gamma from neutron interactions in the detector [2]. The sensitivity of the decay time of the emitted light to the type of particle interaction in the liquid is due to the dependence on the mechanism of excitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%