1999
DOI: 10.3133/ofr99386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital mapping techniques '99 -- workshop proceedings

Abstract: tions to authors; and Adam Davis (USGS) for help with Appendix C. Finally, I thank all attendees for their participation; their enthusiasm and expertise were the primary reasons for the meeting's success. THE NEXT DMT WORKSHOP At discussion session #3, it was decided that a fourth annual DMT meeting would be held, next year. While planning for that event, the Data Capture Working Group will carefully consider the recommendations offered by DMT'99 attendees.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Digital Mapping Techniques '04 (DMTʼ04) workshop was attended by about 100 technical experts from 40 agencies, universities, and private companies, including representatives from 22 state geological surveys (see Appendix A). This workshop was similar in nature to the previous seven meetings, held in Lawrence, Kansas (Soller, 1997), in Champaign, Illinois (Soller, 1998), in Madison, Wisconsin (Soller, 1999), in Lexington, Kentucky (Soller, 2000), in Tuscaloosa, Alabama , in Salt Lake City, Utah (Soller, 2002), and in Millersville, Pennsylvania (Soller, 2003). This yearʼs meeting was hosted by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, from May [16][17][18][19]2004, on the Portland State University campus in Portland, Oregon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The Digital Mapping Techniques '04 (DMTʼ04) workshop was attended by about 100 technical experts from 40 agencies, universities, and private companies, including representatives from 22 state geological surveys (see Appendix A). This workshop was similar in nature to the previous seven meetings, held in Lawrence, Kansas (Soller, 1997), in Champaign, Illinois (Soller, 1998), in Madison, Wisconsin (Soller, 1999), in Lexington, Kentucky (Soller, 2000), in Tuscaloosa, Alabama , in Salt Lake City, Utah (Soller, 2002), and in Millersville, Pennsylvania (Soller, 2003). This yearʼs meeting was hosted by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, from May [16][17][18][19]2004, on the Portland State University campus in Portland, Oregon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The most recent workshop, held in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, and hosted by the Geological Survey of Alabama, was attended by approximately 110 representatives of 48 state, federal, and Canadian agencies and private companies. The workshop proceedings are published (Seller, 1997(Seller, , 1998(Seller, , 1999 this volume) and served on-line at (<http://ncgmp.usgs.gov/pubs/of97-269>; <http://pubs.usgs.gov/openfile/of98-487>; <http://pubs.usgs.gov/openfile/of99-386>, <http://pubs.usgs.gov/openfile/ofOO-325>, and <http://pubs.usgs.gov/openfile/ofO 1 -223>. Published copies of the Proceedings may be obtained from Seller or Berg.…”
Section: Digital Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Digital Mapping Techniques '01 (DMT'Ol) workshop was attended by 108 technical experts from 48 agencies, universities, and private companies, including representatives from 31 state geological surveys (see Appendix A). This workshop was similar in nature to the first four meetings, held in Lawrence, Kansas (Seller, 1997), in Champaign, Illinois (Seller, 1998a), in Madison, Wisconsin (Seller, 1999), and in Lexington, Kentucky . This year's meeting was hosted by the Geological Survey of Alabama, from May 20 to 23, 2001, on the University of Alabama campus in Tuscaloosa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%