2019
DOI: 10.1111/sum.12492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital mapping of soil ecosystem services in Scotland using neural networks and relationship modelling—Part 1: Mapping of soil classes

Abstract: A digital mapping approach was applied to soils in Scotland, producing maps at 100-m resolution and different levels of classification. This used neural networks to predict fuzzy soil class weightings based upon site descriptors from existing soil survey data. The intention of this work was to produce a set of soil maps for Scotland, which provide greater spatial resolution mapping than currently available, and provide fuzzy data to be used in mapping of ecosystem services using a novel approach explained in a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As presented in Table 6, the user's accuracy for the clay loam class for the training dataset was found to be higher than the producer's accuracy. This indicates that the clay loam class as shown on the map is accurate, but their actual presence on the ground is less likely to be detected (Aitkenhead & Coull, 2019). In other words, the existence of the clay loam class is underestimated by the model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As presented in Table 6, the user's accuracy for the clay loam class for the training dataset was found to be higher than the producer's accuracy. This indicates that the clay loam class as shown on the map is accurate, but their actual presence on the ground is less likely to be detected (Aitkenhead & Coull, 2019). In other words, the existence of the clay loam class is underestimated by the model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 6, the producer's accuracy for the loam class in the training set was found to be higher than the user's accuracy. This indicates that the loam class tends to be more accurately identified in the field, but their presence on the map is probably incorrect, an indication of overestimation of the loam class by the model (Aitkenhead & Coull, 2019). This class is more than half of the observed dataset, so this result is expected in data‐driven modelling methods (Wadoux et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the availability of dense sampling intensity along with precise spatial mapping determines the success of surface maps (Yao et al., 2013). The effect of environmental covariates such as climate patterns, parent material, topography and soil management vary to a great extent in a spatio‐temporal framework of nature (Aitkenhead & Coull, 2019; Bian et al., 2020; Dharumarajan et al., 2021; Dharumarajan & Hegde, 2020; Duarte et al., 2022; Li, Liu, et al., 2022; Li, Yue, et al., 2022; Mallik et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022). Therefore, an empirical modelling based on mathematical and statistical methods like digital soil mapping (DSM) that takes into account anthropogenic and environmental factors for the prediction of SOC is more realistic than the geostatistical interpolation techniques (Dharumarajan et al., 2021; Reddy et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%