2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital mapping of GlobalSoilMap soil properties at a broad scale: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 212 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the EPO projection matrix developed from the field data should scan the soil samples under both moist intact and dry ground conditions. However, this method is difficult in practical applications when collecting an adequate number of soil samples for EPO development is impossible because of sampling or economic difficulties [71]. Overall, in our case, in terms of prediction accuracy, P1 and P2 slightly differed (Table 2).…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Conversely, the EPO projection matrix developed from the field data should scan the soil samples under both moist intact and dry ground conditions. However, this method is difficult in practical applications when collecting an adequate number of soil samples for EPO development is impossible because of sampling or economic difficulties [71]. Overall, in our case, in terms of prediction accuracy, P1 and P2 slightly differed (Table 2).…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Mirás-Avalos et al [33] observed a proportionally lower prediction accuracy of kriging with a larger distance from the nearest soil sample, resulting in unrealistic smoothing due to extrapolation, which is exaggerated for agricultural parcels with non-regular shapes. Reduced accuracy of conventional interpolation methods with a larger heterogeneity in soil types [33] and ineffective stratification [36] are the additional components which indicate a necessity for improving soil prediction performed by conventional interpolation methods [37]. The importance of selecting the optimal interpolation method and its parameters for fertilization in precision agriculture is manifested by avoiding poor agricultural practices and reducing the consumption of mineral and/or organic fertilizers.…”
Section: Conventional Approach To Fertilization In Precision Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the variety of statistical indicators of the interpolation accuracy, the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) and the root-mean-square error (RMSE) are two of the most commonly used values [37], also enabling complementary accuracy assessment [52]. For the purpose of the accuracy assessment of predicted soil properties used in fertilization in precision agriculture, these are calculated according to Equations ( 2) and (3) [47]:…”
Section: Conventional Approach To Fertilization In Precision Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, Gautam et al [35] employed ensemble machine learning models to estimate the baseline and dynamics of topsoil carbon stocks at a spatial resolution of 100 m in the United States and showed a total loss of 1.80 Pg carbon under the high-emission scenario by 2100. However, previous studies using the data-driven models for SOC stock prediction mainly focused on the effects of climate and land-use change, and until recently, the ability of machine learning-based data-driven models to detect the salinity-induced SOC dynamics has not been addressed, especially in inland regions [36,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%