2016
DOI: 10.1080/07380569.2016.1179025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Literacies Go to School: A Cross-Case Analysis of the Literacy Practices Used in a Classroom-Based Social Network Site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies cited the number of individuals posting to a social media platform, whereas others indicated sample by total number of social media posts without tracking individual posters. These became important distinctions when comparing studies focused on thousands of individual posts (e.g., Greenhalgh & Koehler, 2017) to studies focused on the experiences of a few case study participants (e.g., Lindstrom & Niederhauser, 2016). To maintain transparency, each coder worked with her own copy of the spreadsheet template and points of initial disagreement and the resolution were noted and preserved within our spreadsheets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies cited the number of individuals posting to a social media platform, whereas others indicated sample by total number of social media posts without tracking individual posters. These became important distinctions when comparing studies focused on thousands of individual posts (e.g., Greenhalgh & Koehler, 2017) to studies focused on the experiences of a few case study participants (e.g., Lindstrom & Niederhauser, 2016). To maintain transparency, each coder worked with her own copy of the spreadsheet template and points of initial disagreement and the resolution were noted and preserved within our spreadsheets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventeen articles (29%) focused on K-12 teachers' use of the microblog Twitter. Other single-platform studies covered YouTube (Blonder et al, 2013), Ning (Lindstrom & Niederhauser, 2016), Voxer (Carpenter & Green, 2017), and the Online Professional Development Platform (Zhang et al, 2017). The remaining articles (N = 18, 31%) investigated teachers' social media use across multiple platforms or generally without specifying a particular type.…”
Section: Figure 2 Geographic Location Of Reviewed Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of school, and in reference to the group of teachers followed in this research, DL is identified with the use of devices, digital services, and websites, and is included in learning and teaching activities (Lindstrom and Niederhauser 2016). The educational aspect of new media is particularly important when we consider its potential to improve the efficiency of and the presence of multimedia in the didactic process (Potyrała 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical/conceptual Framework DLmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She noted that teachers and students needed time to explore digital tools and talk with others about this tool use; however, most PD often focuses on hardware rather than tool integration into curriculum. Lindstrom and Niederhauser (2016) looked at social network sites and how they supported reading and writing in a fifth-grade classroom multiple-case study. They found that PD was also important because sometimes classroom teachers made rules with digital tools that inhibited student design.…”
Section: Integration Of Digital Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%